Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica SL
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


67 Imaging
72 Features
78 Overall
74
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica SL Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2019
- Previous Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Replacement is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 50000
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 847g - 147 x 104 x 39mm
- Introduced October 2015
- Also referred to as Typ 601
- Replacement is Leica SL2

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica SL Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica SL, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by brands Hasselblad and Leica. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and SL (24MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and SL (Full frame) offer totally different sensor sizes.

The X1D II 50C was launched 3 years after the SL which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Leica SL being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the X1D II 50C grades against the SL in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica SL Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Leica SL. The complete galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Leica SL Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Leica SL
X1D II 50C | SL | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2019 | ![]() | October 2015 | Newer by 45 months |
Display size | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 1040k | Clearer display (+1320k dot) |
Reasons to pick Leica SL over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
SL | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Leica SL
X1D II 50C | SL | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica SL Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera often, you need to consider its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has got external dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Leica SL has proportions of 147mm x 104mm x 39mm (5.8" x 4.1" x 1.5") along with a weight of 847 grams (1.87 lbs).
Contrast the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica SL in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the X1D II 50C versus the SL.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and SL is 60 and 67 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica SL Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specs. The pic underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D II 50C and SL.
All in all, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The X1D II 50C because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will result in greater detail utilizing its extra 27 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The newer X1D II 50C will have a benefit in sensor technology.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica SL Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Leica SL Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Leica SL | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Leica |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Leica SL |
Also referred to as | - | Typ 601 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2019-06-19 | 2015-10-21 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Maestro II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 36 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 864.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 50000 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Leica L |
Number of lenses | 13 | 30 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.60" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 2,360k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | 4,400k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.8x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.7 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 4096 x 2160 (24p), 3840 x 2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (120p, 60p, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 60p, 30p, 24p) |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lb) | 847 gr (1.87 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 147 x 104 x 39mm (5.8" x 4.1" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 102 | 88 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 25.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 13.4 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 1821 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BP-SCL4 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported on slot 1) |
Card slots | Two | Two |
Price at release | $5,750 | $7,450 |