Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon 1 V3
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


87 Imaging
49 Features
79 Overall
61
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon 1 V3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Revealed June 2019
- Previous Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Refreshed by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon 1 Mount
- 381g - 111 x 65 x 33mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Replaced the Nikon 1 V2

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon 1 V3 Overview
Below is a thorough comparison of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Nikon 1 V3, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Nikon. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and 1 V3 (18MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and 1 V3 (1") enjoy totally different sensor size.

The X1D II 50C was launched 5 years later than the 1 V3 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the X1D II 50C scores against the 1 V3 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon 1 V3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Nikon 1 V3. The complete galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Nikon 1 V3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Nikon 1 V3
X1D II 50C | 1 V3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2019 | ![]() | March 2014 | More recent by 65 months |
Screen dimension | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
Screen resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 1037k | Sharper screen (+1323k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon 1 V3 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
1 V3 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Nikon 1 V3
X1D II 50C | 1 V3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon 1 V3 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has outside measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Nikon 1 V3 has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 33mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 381 grams (0.84 lbs).
Compare the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Nikon 1 V3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the X1D II 50C versus the 1 V3.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and 1 V3 is 60 and 87 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon 1 V3 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reading through specifications. The visual here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and 1 V3.
Plainly, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will resolve more detail utilizing its extra 33 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The fresher X1D II 50C is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon 1 V3 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon 1 V3 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Nikon 1 V3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Nikon |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Nikon 1 V3 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2019-06-19 | 2014-03-13 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Expeed 4A |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5232 x 3488 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 160 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | 171 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Nikon 1 |
Number of lenses | 13 | 13 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3.60 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 2,360k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | TFT-LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/10000s | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.7 frames/s | 60.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.00 m (ISO 100) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Fill-flash, fill-flash w/slow sync, rear curtain sync, rear curtain w/slow sync, redeye reduction, redeye reduction w/slow sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/2000s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lbs) | 381 gr (0.84 lbs) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 111 x 65 x 33mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 102 | 52 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 20.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 10.7 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 384 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 310 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | EN-EL20a |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | microSD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Two | One |
Cost at release | $5,750 | $997 |