Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon D2H
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


51 Imaging
41 Features
40 Overall
40
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon D2H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2019
- Succeeded the Hasselblad X1D
- New Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 4MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 1600
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Nikon F Mount
- 1200g - 158 x 150 x 86mm
- Announced December 2003
- Superseded the Nikon D1H
- Renewed by Nikon D2Hs

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon D2H Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon D2H, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Pro DSLR by competitors Hasselblad and Nikon. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and D2H (4MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and D2H (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizing.

The X1D II 50C was introduced 15 years later than the D2H and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Nikon D2H being a Large SLR camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the X1D II 50C matches up vs the D2H for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon D2H Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Nikon D2H. The whole galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Nikon D2H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Nikon D2H
X1D II 50C | D2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2019 | ![]() | December 2003 | More recent by 189 months |
Display dimension | 3.60" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+1.1") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 211k | Clearer display (+2149k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Nikon D2H over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
D2H | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Nikon D2H
X1D II 50C | D2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon D2H Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has got external measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Nikon D2H has measurements of 158mm x 150mm x 86mm (6.2" x 5.9" x 3.4") and a weight of 1200 grams (2.65 lbs).
Check out the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon D2H in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the X1D II 50C compared to the D2H.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and D2H is 60 and 51 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon D2H Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements purely by going through specs. The visual here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and D2H.
All in all, both cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C having a larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will produce greater detail using its extra 47MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more modern X1D II 50C will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon D2H Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon D2H Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Nikon D2H | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Nikon |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Nikon D2H |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro DSLR |
Introduced | 2019-06-19 | 2003-12-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | JFET |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 23.7 x 15.5mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 367.4mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 4MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 2464 x 1632 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Nikon F |
Total lenses | 13 | 309 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.60" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 211 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/10000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.7 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Front curtain, Rear curtain, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | - |
Max video resolution | 2720x1530 | None |
Video data format | H.264 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 pounds) | 1200 gr (2.65 pounds) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 158 x 150 x 86mm (6.2" x 5.9" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 102 | 40 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 18.9 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 10.0 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 352 |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 to 20 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Compact Flash (Type I or II) |
Card slots | 2 | 1 |
Price at release | $5,750 | $253 |