Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z6
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


62 Imaging
74 Features
88 Overall
79
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2019
- Succeeded the Hasselblad X1D
- Later Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Boost to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Nikon Z Mount
- 675g - 134 x 101 x 68mm
- Released August 2018
- New Model is Nikon Z6 II

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z6 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Nikon Z6, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals Hasselblad and Nikon. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and Z6 (25MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and Z6 (Full frame) posses different sensor size.

The X1D II 50C was released 10 months later than the Z6 and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras have different body design with the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Nikon Z6 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the X1D II 50C matches up against the Z6 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z6 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Nikon Z6. The complete galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Nikon Z6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Nikon Z6
X1D II 50C | Z6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2019 | ![]() | August 2018 | Fresher by 10 months |
Display dimensions | 3.60" | ![]() | 3.2" | Larger display (+0.4") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 2100k | Crisper display (+260k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon Z6 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Z6 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Nikon Z6
X1D II 50C | Z6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z6 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has physical measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Nikon Z6 has measurements of 134mm x 101mm x 68mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 2.7") and a weight of 675 grams (1.49 lbs).
Contrast the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Nikon Z6 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the X1D II 50C vs the Z6.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and Z6 is 60 and 62 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z6 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizing purely by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and Z6.
Clearly, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The X1D II 50C because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will give greater detail as a result of its extra 26MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent X1D II 50C provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z6 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z6 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Nikon Z6 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Hasselblad | Nikon |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Nikon Z6 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2019-06-19 | 2018-08-23 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Expeed 6 |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 35.9 x 23.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 858.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 25 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 5:4, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 6048 x 4024 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 204800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 273 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Nikon Z |
Total lenses | 13 | 15 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3.60" | 3.2" |
Display resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 2,100 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | 3,690 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.8x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.7 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Front-curtain sync, slow sync, rear-curtain sync, red-eye reduction, red-eye reduction with slow sync, slow rear-curtain sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | 1/200 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 144 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lbs) | 675 grams (1.49 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 134 x 101 x 68mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | 95 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 25.3 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 14.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 3299 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 5, 10 or 20 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | XQD card |
Card slots | Two | 1 |
Price at release | $5,750 | $1,997 |