Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z7
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
62 Imaging
78 Features
89 Overall
82
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2019
- Replaced the Hasselblad X1D
- New Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 46MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 25600 (Raise to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Nikon Z Mount
- 675g - 134 x 101 x 68mm
- Announced August 2018
- Successor is Nikon Z7 II
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z7 Overview
Lets look much closer at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z7, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by companies Hasselblad and Nikon. The resolution of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and the Z7 (46MP) is fairly well matched but the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and Z7 (Full frame) possess different sensor sizes.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe X1D II 50C was unveiled 10 months after the Z7 and they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Nikon Z7 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the X1D II 50C matches up against the Z7 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z7 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Nikon Z7. The full galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Nikon Z7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Nikon Z7
X1D II 50C | Z7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2019 | August 2018 | More modern by 10 months | |
Display dimension | 3.60" | 3.2" | Larger display (+0.4") | |
Display resolution | 2360k | 2100k | Clearer display (+260k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon Z7 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Z7 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Nikon Z7
X1D II 50C | Z7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z7 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C features physical measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Nikon Z7 has dimensions of 134mm x 101mm x 68mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 2.7") with a weight of 675 grams (1.49 lbs).
Examine the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z7 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the X1D II 50C and the Z7.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and Z7 is 60 and 62 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z7 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes only by reading through specifications. The picture below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and Z7.
To sum up, each of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will resolve extra detail having an extra 5MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The newer X1D II 50C should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z7 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z7 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Nikon Z7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Hasselblad | Nikon |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Nikon Z7 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2019-06-19 | 2018-08-23 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Expeed 6 |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 35.9 x 23.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 858.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 46MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 5:4, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 8256 x 5504 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 32 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | 493 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Nikon Z |
Amount of lenses | 13 | 15 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3.60 inch | 3.2 inch |
Resolution of display | 2,360k dot | 2,100k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dot | 3,690k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.8x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/10000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.7 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Front-curtain sync, slow sync, rear-curtain sync, red-eye reduction, red-eye reduction with slow sync, slow rear-curtain sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/2000s | 1/200s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 144 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 2720x1530 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lbs) | 675 grams (1.49 lbs) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 134 x 101 x 68mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 102 | 99 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 26.3 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 14.6 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 2668 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 5, 10 or 20 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | XQD card |
Storage slots | Two | One |
Price at release | $5,750 | $2,797 |