Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z7 II
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


61 Imaging
80 Features
92 Overall
84
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z7 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2019
- Old Model is Hasselblad X1D
- New Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 46MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Tilting Screen
- ISO 64 - 25600 (Increase to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Nikon Z Mount
- 705g - 134 x 101 x 70mm
- Introduced October 2020
- Older Model is Nikon Z7

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z7 II Overview
Here is a in depth overview of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z7 II, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by manufacturers Hasselblad and Nikon. The image resolution of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and the Z7 II (46MP) is relatively close but the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and Z7 II (Full frame) possess totally different sensor size.

The X1D II 50C was launched 16 months earlier than the Z7 II which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras come with different body type with the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Nikon Z7 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a complete comparison, below is a simple summary of how the X1D II 50C scores versus the Z7 II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z7 II Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Nikon Z7 Mark II. The complete galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Nikon Z7 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Nikon Z7 II
X1D II 50C | Z7 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3.60" | ![]() | 3.2" | Bigger screen (+0.4") |
Screen resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 2100k | Sharper screen (+260k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon Z7 II over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Z7 II | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2020 | ![]() | June 2019 | Fresher by 16 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Nikon Z7 II
X1D II 50C | Z7 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z7 II Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has outer dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Nikon Z7 II has proportions of 134mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 2.8") having a weight of 705 grams (1.55 lbs).
Check the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z7 II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the X1D II 50C vs the Z7 II.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and Z7 II is 60 and 61 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z7 II Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to envision the gap in sensor sizing merely by looking through specifications. The photograph here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D II 50C and Z7 II.
Plainly, the two cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The X1D II 50C featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The older X1D II 50C will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z7 II Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Nikon Z7 II Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Nikon Z7 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Nikon |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Nikon Z7 Mark II |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2019-06-19 | 2020-10-14 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 35.9 x 23.9mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 858.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 46 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 5:4, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 8256 x 5504 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 32 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | 493 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Nikon Z |
Total lenses | 13 | 15 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3.60 inches | 3.2 inches |
Display resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 2,100 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | 3,690 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.8x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/10000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.7fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Front-curtain sync, slow sync, rear-curtain sync, red-eye reduction, red-eye reduction with slow sync, slow rear-curtain sync, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | 1/200 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 144 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 2720x1530 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 pounds) | 705 gr (1.55 pounds) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 134 x 101 x 70mm (5.3" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 420 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 5, 10 or 20 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | CFexpress (Type B), XQD, SD (UHS-II) |
Card slots | Two | Two |
Price at release | $5,750 | $2,997 |