Clicky

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 III

Portability
60
Imaging
84
Features
74
Overall
80
Hasselblad X1D II 50C front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
Portability
67
Imaging
61
Features
96
Overall
75

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 III Key Specs

Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
  • 51MP - Medium format Sensor
  • 3.60" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 2720 x 1530 video
  • Hasselblad X Mount
  • 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
  • Introduced June 2019
  • Older Model is Hasselblad X1D
  • Newer Model is Hasselblad X2D
Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Released February 2020
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1 II
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 III Overview

Lets look more in depth at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-M1 III, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by competitors Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-M1 III (20MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-M1 III (Four Thirds) boast different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The X1D II 50C was revealed 7 months before the E-M1 III and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras have different body design with the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the X1D II 50C scores against the E-M1 III for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-M1 III

 X1D II 50C E-M1 III 
Display dimensions3.60"3"Larger display (+0.6")
Display resolution2360k1037kSharper display (+1323k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C

 E-M1 III X1D II 50C 
ReleasedFebruary 2020June 2019More recent by 7 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-M1 III

 X1D II 50C E-M1 III 
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 III Physical Comparison

For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C enjoys exterior measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 III has sizing of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).

Analyze the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-M1 III in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the X1D II 50C vs the E-M1 III.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 III size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and E-M1 III is 60 and 67 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 III top view buttons comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 III Sensor Comparison

Often, its tough to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements only by viewing specs. The visual below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and E-M1 III.

All in all, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will result in extra detail because of its extra 31MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The older X1D II 50C will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 III sensor size comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and ViewFinder

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Portrait photography info
Olympus E-M1 III Portrait photography info
90
focusing manually
great flash sync speed (1/2,000 seconds)
excellent megapixels (51 megapixels)
big sensor size (Medium format)
exports RAW files
76
manual focus
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Street photography with Olympus E-M1 III
69
big sensor size (Medium format)
exports RAW files
offers focus by touch
environment proofing
very good ISO range (25,600)
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
78
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
supports touch focus
environment proof
great high ISO (25,600)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sports photography info
Olympus E-M1 III Sports photography info
73
quiet mode (1/10,000s)
excellent megapixels (51MP)
big sensor size (Medium format)
supports tracking focus
environment proofing
slow continuous shooting (2.7 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
lack of phase detect AF
80
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet mode (1/32,000 seconds)
high frames per second (60.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes tracking autofocus
environment proof
supports phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Travel photography factors
Olympus E-M1 III Travel photography factors
64
environment proofing
offers focus by touch
excellent megapixels (51MP)
missing Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
79
environment proof
supports bluetooth
supports touch focus
good MP (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Landscape photography features
Olympus E-M1 III Landscape photography features
80
focusing manually
switch lenses (Hasselblad X mount)
very good size screen (3.60 inches)
excellent megapixels (51 megapixels)
big sensor size (Medium format)
very good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
environment proofing
has double storage slots
lack of image stabilization
missing Timelapse recording
81
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
no anti-alias filter
great high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
environment proof
2 card slots
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-M1 III as a Vlogging camera
32
has touchscreen
video resolution high (2720 x 1530 pixels)
includes microphone port
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
79
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen capability
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detection autofocus
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 pixels)
comes with external mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-M1 III
 Hasselblad X1D II 50COlympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
General Information
Brand Name Hasselblad Olympus
Model type Hasselblad X1D II 50C Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III
Type Pro Mirrorless Pro Mirrorless
Introduced 2019-06-19 2020-02-11
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - TruePic IX
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Medium format Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 44 x 33mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 1,452.0mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 51MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 4:3 4:3
Full resolution 8272 x 6200 5184 x 3888
Max native ISO 25600 25600
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW files
Lowest boosted ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 117 121
Cross type focus points - 121
Lens
Lens support Hasselblad X Micro Four Thirds
Amount of lenses 13 107
Focal length multiplier 0.8 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display sizing 3.60 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 2,360 thousand dots 1,037 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 3,690 thousand dots 2,360 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.87x 0.74x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/8000 secs
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/10000 secs 1/32000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 2.7 frames/s 60.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash modes no built-in flash Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/2000 secs 1/250 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 2720 x 1530 (30p) 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Max video resolution 2720x1530 4096x2160
Video file format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS Built-in None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 725 gr (1.60 pounds) 580 gr (1.28 pounds)
Physical dimensions 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 102 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 26.2 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 14.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 4489 not tested
Other
Battery life - 420 shots
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLH-1
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot)
Card slots Dual Dual
Price at launch $5,750 $1,800