Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 III
60 Imaging
84 Features
74 Overall
80
67 Imaging
61 Features
96 Overall
75
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2019
- Older Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Newer Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Released February 2020
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1 II
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 III Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-M1 III, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by competitors Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-M1 III (20MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-M1 III (Four Thirds) boast different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe X1D II 50C was revealed 7 months before the E-M1 III and they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras have different body design with the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the X1D II 50C scores against the E-M1 III for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 III Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III. The full galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Olympus E-M1 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-M1 III
| X1D II 50C | E-M1 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.60" | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
| Display resolution | 2360k | 1037k | Sharper display (+1323k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
| E-M1 III | X1D II 50C | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2020 | June 2019 | More recent by 7 months | |
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-M1 III
| X1D II 50C | E-M1 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 III Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C enjoys exterior measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 III has sizing of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).
Analyze the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-M1 III in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view size comparison of the X1D II 50C vs the E-M1 III.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and E-M1 III is 60 and 67 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 III Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to visualize the contrast in sensor measurements only by viewing specs. The visual below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and E-M1 III.
All in all, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C with its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will result in extra detail because of its extra 31MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The older X1D II 50C will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1 III Specifications
| Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Hasselblad | Olympus |
| Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III |
| Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2019-06-19 | 2020-02-11 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic IX |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 51MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | 117 | 121 |
| Cross type focus points | - | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 13 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 3.60 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 2,360 thousand dots | 1,037 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | 1/32000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.7 frames/s | 60.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 2720x1530 | 4096x2160 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 725 gr (1.60 pounds) | 580 gr (1.28 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 102 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 420 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BLH-1 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) |
| Card slots | Dual | Dual |
| Price at launch | $5,750 | $1,800 |