Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1X
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
54 Imaging
61 Features
93 Overall
73
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1X Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2019
- Earlier Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Successor is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 997g - 144 x 147 x 75mm
- Released January 2019
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1X Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1X, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by companies Hasselblad and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-M1X (20MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-M1X (Four Thirds) feature different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe X1D II 50C was revealed 5 months after the E-M1X so they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M1X being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise summation of how the X1D II 50C matches up vs the E-M1X when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1X Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus OM-D E-M1X. The full galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Olympus E-M1X Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-M1X
X1D II 50C | E-M1X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.60" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 1037k | Clearer screen (+1323k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1X over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
E-M1X | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-M1X
X1D II 50C | E-M1X | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2019 | January 2019 | Same generation | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1X Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C features outside measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1X has measurements of 144mm x 147mm x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") having a weight of 997 grams (2.20 lbs).
Look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1X in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the X1D II 50C versus the E-M1X.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and E-M1X is 60 and 54 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1X Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes simply by looking through specifications. The pic here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and E-M1X.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C with its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will render more detail because of its extra 31 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures far more aggressively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1X Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-M1X Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus OM-D E-M1X | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus OM-D E-M1X |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2019-06-19 | 2019-01-24 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 13 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3.60" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 2,360k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.7 frames/s | 60.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 2720x1530 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | Yes (USB-PD allows charging by laptop or external power bank) |
GPS | Built-in | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 pounds) | 997 grams (2.20 pounds) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 144 x 147 x 75mm (5.7" x 5.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 870 photographs |
Battery type | - | Built-in |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | - |
Card slots | Two | Two |
Launch price | $5,750 | $2,999 |