Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P3
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
86 Imaging
48 Features
60 Overall
52
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2019
- Superseded the Hasselblad X1D
- New Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 369g - 122 x 69 x 34mm
- Introduced August 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-P2
- Updated by Olympus E-P5
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P3 Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P3, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Hasselblad and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-P3 (12MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-P3 (Four Thirds) provide different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe X1D II 50C was manufactured 7 years after the E-P3 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the X1D II 50C scores vs the E-P3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus PEN E-P3. The entire galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Olympus E-P3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-P3
X1D II 50C | E-P3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2019 | August 2011 | Newer by 96 months | |
Display size | 3.60" | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
Display resolution | 2360k | 614k | Crisper display (+1746k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P3 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
E-P3 | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-P3
X1D II 50C | E-P3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P3 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C comes with exterior dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Olympus E-P3 has measurements of 122mm x 69mm x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") along with a weight of 369 grams (0.81 lbs).
See the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P3 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the X1D II 50C against the E-P3.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and E-P3 is 60 and 86 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions simply by seeing specs. The pic below should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D II 50C and E-P3.
All in all, each of these cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The X1D II 50C because of its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will provide greater detail due to its extra 39 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The younger X1D II 50C provides an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P3 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-P3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-P3 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2019-06-19 | 2011-08-17 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4032 x 3024 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 13 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.60 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 2,360 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | 3:2 OLED with Anti-Fingerprint Coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/10000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.7 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m (@ ISO 200) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Wireless, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/2000s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 lbs) | 369g (0.81 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 122 x 69 x 34mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 102 | 51 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 20.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 10.1 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 536 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 2 | Single |
Cost at release | $5,750 | $0 |