Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P5
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
85 Imaging
52 Features
76 Overall
61
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2019
- Succeeded the Hasselblad X1D
- New Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 420g - 122 x 69 x 37mm
- Released October 2013
- Replaced the Olympus E-P3
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P5 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P5, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Hasselblad and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-P5 (16MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-P5 (Four Thirds) enjoy totally different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe X1D II 50C was launched 5 years after the E-P5 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the X1D II 50C grades vs the E-P5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Olympus PEN E-P5. The complete galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Olympus E-P5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-P5
X1D II 50C | E-P5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2019 | October 2013 | More modern by 70 months | |
Screen dimension | 3.60" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 1037k | Sharper screen (+1323k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P5 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
E-P5 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-P5
X1D II 50C | E-P5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P5 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C provides outside measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Olympus E-P5 has measurements of 122mm x 69mm x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") having a weight of 420 grams (0.93 lbs).
Take a look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P5 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the X1D II 50C against the E-P5.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and E-P5 is 60 and 85 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P5 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes purely by checking out specs. The picture underneath might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and E-P5.
All in all, both of those cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C due to its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will provide more detail utilizing its extra 35 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent X1D II 50C will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P5 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-P5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-P5 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2019-06-19 | 2013-10-03 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 13 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3.60 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 2,360 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | 3:2 LCD capacitive touchscreen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.7 frames per second | 9.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (ISO 100) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync (1st or 2nd curtain), Manual (1/1 - 1/64) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/2000 secs | 1/320 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 pounds) | 420 grams (0.93 pounds) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 122 x 69 x 37mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | 72 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 895 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Dual | Single |
Launch pricing | $5,750 | $389 |