Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P7
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
86 Imaging
63 Features
84 Overall
71
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2019
- Old Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Replacement is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.00" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 337g - 118 x 69 x 38mm
- Revealed June 2021
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P7 Overview
In this article, we will be matching up the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-P7, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Hasselblad and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-P7 (20MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-P7 (Four Thirds) enjoy different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe X1D II 50C was brought out 24 months before the E-P7 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a quick summation of how the X1D II 50C matches up versus the E-P7 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P7 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus PEN E-P7. The entire galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Olympus E-P7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-P7
X1D II 50C | E-P7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.60" | 3.00" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 1040k | Crisper screen (+1320k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P7 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
E-P7 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2021 | June 2019 | Newer by 24 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-P7
X1D II 50C | E-P7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P7 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C comes with outside dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-P7 has dimensions of 118mm x 69mm x 38mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") with a weight of 337 grams (0.74 lbs).
Examine the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-P7 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view proportions comparison of the X1D II 50C vs the E-P7.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and E-P7 is 60 and 86 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P7 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions merely by seeing technical specs. The image underneath may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D II 50C and E-P7.
As you can tell, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The X1D II 50C due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will provide greater detail having its extra 31MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged X1D II 50C will be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P7 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-P7 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-P7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-P7 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2019-06-19 | 2021-06-09 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 13 | 118 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3.60 inch | 3.00 inch |
Display resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/10000s | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.7 frames/s | 8.7 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash off, Red-eye Slow sync. (1st curtain), Slow sync. (1st curtain), Slow sync. (2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | BLS-50 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 pounds) | 337g (0.74 pounds) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 118 x 69 x 38mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | Two | One |
Pricing at launch | $5,750 | $800 |