Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1s
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1s Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2019
- Succeeded the Hasselblad X1D
- Refreshed by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Revealed November 2010
- Old Model is Olympus E-PL1
- Updated by Olympus E-PL2
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1s Overview
Let's look more closely at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL1s, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-PL1s (12MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-PL1s (Four Thirds) posses different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe X1D II 50C was unveiled 8 years after the E-PL1s which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the X1D II 50C matches up vs the E-PL1s with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1s Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Olympus PEN E-PL1s. The full galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Olympus E-PL1s Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-PL1s
X1D II 50C | E-PL1s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2019 | November 2010 | More modern by 105 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3.60" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.9") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 230k | Sharper screen (+2130k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
E-PL1s | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL1s
X1D II 50C | E-PL1s | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1s Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has got exterior measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL1s has dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).
See the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL1s in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the X1D II 50C against the E-PL1s.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and E-PL1s is 60 and 86 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1s Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specs. The picture underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and E-PL1s.
All in all, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will deliver extra detail having an extra 39 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger X1D II 50C should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1s Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1s Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-PL1s | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-PL1s |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2019-06-19 | 2010-11-16 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Truepic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4032 x 3024 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 13 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3.60" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 2,360 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/10000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.7 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.00 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/2000s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lb) | 334 gr (0.74 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | Two | 1 |
Pricing at release | $5,750 | $599 |