Clicky

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1s

Portability
60
Imaging
85
Features
74
Overall
80
Hasselblad X1D II 50C front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL1s front
Portability
86
Imaging
47
Features
43
Overall
45

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1s Key Specs

Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
  • 51MP - Medium format Sensor
  • 3.60" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 2720 x 1530 video
  • Hasselblad X Mount
  • 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
  • Introduced June 2019
  • Succeeded the Hasselblad X1D
  • Refreshed by Hasselblad X2D
Olympus E-PL1s
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
  • Revealed November 2010
  • Old Model is Olympus E-PL1
  • Updated by Olympus E-PL2
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1s Overview

Let's look more closely at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL1s, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-PL1s (12MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-PL1s (Four Thirds) posses different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The X1D II 50C was unveiled 8 years after the E-PL1s which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the X1D II 50C matches up vs the E-PL1s with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-PL1s

 X1D II 50C E-PL1s 
RevealedJune 2019November 2010More modern by 105 months
Screen dimensions3.60"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.9")
Screen resolution2360k230kSharper screen (+2130k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1s over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C

 E-PL1s X1D II 50C 

Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL1s

 X1D II 50C E-PL1s 
Focus manually More precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1s Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has got exterior measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL1s has dimensions of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).

See the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL1s in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the X1D II 50C against the E-PL1s.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1s size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and E-PL1s is 60 and 86 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1s top view buttons comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1s Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specs. The picture underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and E-PL1s.

All in all, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will deliver extra detail having an extra 39 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The younger X1D II 50C should have an advantage in sensor tech.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1s sensor size comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1s Screen and ViewFinder

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1s Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Portrait photography info
Olympus E-PL1s Portrait photography info
91
has manual focus
flash sync is higher than normal (1/2,000 seconds)
megapixel count amazing (51 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Medium format)
saves RAW files
60
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focus
delivers RAW files
MP count low (12 megapixels)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-PL1s as a Street photography camera
69
sensor size is great (Medium format)
saves RAW files
includes touch focus
environment sealing
good ISO range (25,600)
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
74
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen does not articulate
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sports photography factors
Olympus E-PL1s Sports photography factors
73
quiet mode (1/10,000 seconds)
megapixel count amazing (51MP)
sensor size is great (Medium format)
comes with tracking focus
environment sealing
max fps very slow (2.7 fps)
no image stabilization
lacks phase detect auto focus
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
MP count low (12MP)
low battery life (290 CIPA)
does not have phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Travel photography factors
Olympus E-PL1s Travel photography factors
65
environment sealing
includes touch focus
megapixel count amazing (51MP)
does not have Time Lapse mode
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
51
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse function
low battery life (290 per charge)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Landscape photography info
Olympus E-PL1s Landscape photography info
80
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Hasselblad X mount)
bigger than average screen (3.60 inches)
megapixel count amazing (51MP)
sensor size is great (Medium format)
good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
environment sealing
has dual storage slots
no image stabilization
does not have Time Lapse mode
55
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inches)
MP count low (12MP)
low battery life (290 per charge)
missing Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Vlogging details
Olympus E-PL1s Vlogging details
32
touchscreen functionality
video res high (2720 x 1530 pxls)
has mic jack
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
29
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detect focus
display isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL1s Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL1s
 Hasselblad X1D II 50COlympus PEN E-PL1s
General Information
Make Hasselblad Olympus
Model Hasselblad X1D II 50C Olympus PEN E-PL1s
Category Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2019-06-19 2010-11-16
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Truepic V
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Medium format Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 44 x 33mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 1,452.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 51MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 8272 x 6200 4032 x 3024
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 117 11
Lens
Lens mounting type Hasselblad X Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 13 107
Crop factor 0.8 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3.60" 2.7"
Resolution of display 2,360 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology - HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 3,690 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.87x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 60s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/10000s -
Continuous shutter rate 2.7 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 10.00 m
Flash settings no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/2000s 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 2720 x 1530 (30p) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 2720x1530 1280x720
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Built-in None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 725 gr (1.60 lb) 334 gr (0.74 lb)
Physical dimensions 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 102 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 26.2 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 14.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 4489 not tested
Other
Battery life - 290 photos
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model - BLS-1
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC
Card slots Two 1
Pricing at release $5,750 $599