Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL3
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
88 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2019
- Old Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Renewed by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
- Released September 2011
- Superseded the Olympus E-PL2
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL3 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Olympus E-PL3, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-PL3 (12MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-PL3 (Four Thirds) posses different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe X1D II 50C was manufactured 7 years after the E-PL3 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a short view of how the X1D II 50C scores vs the E-PL3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus PEN E-PL3. The entire galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Olympus E-PL3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-PL3
X1D II 50C | E-PL3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2019 | September 2011 | Newer by 95 months | |
Display dimensions | 3.60" | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
Display resolution | 2360k | 460k | Clearer display (+1900k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
E-PL3 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL3
X1D II 50C | E-PL3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C offers exterior measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL3 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs).
Check the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Olympus E-PL3 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the X1D II 50C vs the E-PL3.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and E-PL3 is 60 and 88 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL3 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions purely by researching specs. The image below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and E-PL3.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The X1D II 50C due to its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will result in greater detail due to its extra 39 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more recent X1D II 50C should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL3 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-PL3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-PL3 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2019-06-19 | 2011-09-20 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Truepic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4032 x 3024 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 13 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3.60 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/10000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.7 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 lb) | 313g (0.69 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | 52 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 20.9 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 10.3 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 499 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 2 | Single |
Retail price | $5,750 | $399 |