Clicky

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL3

Portability
60
Imaging
85
Features
74
Overall
80
Hasselblad X1D II 50C front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL3 front
Portability
88
Imaging
48
Features
52
Overall
49

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL3 Key Specs

Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
  • 51MP - Medium format Sensor
  • 3.60" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 2720 x 1530 video
  • Hasselblad X Mount
  • 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
  • Introduced June 2019
  • Old Model is Hasselblad X1D
  • Renewed by Hasselblad X2D
Olympus E-PL3
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 12800
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 313g - 110 x 64 x 37mm
  • Released September 2011
  • Superseded the Olympus E-PL2
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL3 Overview

On this page, we are reviewing the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Olympus E-PL3, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-PL3 (12MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-PL3 (Four Thirds) posses different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The X1D II 50C was manufactured 7 years after the E-PL3 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before we go right into a in depth comparison, here is a short view of how the X1D II 50C scores vs the E-PL3 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-PL3

 X1D II 50C E-PL3 
ReleasedJune 2019September 2011Newer by 95 months
Display dimensions3.60"3"Larger display (+0.6")
Display resolution2360k460kClearer display (+1900k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL3 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C

 E-PL3 X1D II 50C 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL3

 X1D II 50C E-PL3 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL3 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C offers exterior measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL3 has measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5") and a weight of 313 grams (0.69 lbs).

Check the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Olympus E-PL3 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the X1D II 50C vs the E-PL3.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL3 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and E-PL3 is 60 and 88 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL3 top view buttons comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL3 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions purely by researching specs. The image below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and E-PL3.

As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The X1D II 50C due to its larger sensor is going to make getting bokeh easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will result in greater detail due to its extra 39 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more recent X1D II 50C should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL3 sensor size comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and ViewFinder

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Portrait photography info
Olympus E-PL3 Portrait photography info
91
you can focus manually
above average flash sync (1/2,000s)
megapixel count excellent (51MP)
great sensor size (Medium format)
delivers RAW files
60
manual focus
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focus
saves RAW files
resolution not great (12MP)
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Street photography factors
Olympus E-PL3 Street photography factors
69
great sensor size (Medium format)
delivers RAW files
provides focus by touch
environment sealing
good ISO range (25,600)
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
84
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sports photography info
Olympus E-PL3 Sports photography info
73
quiet mode (1/10,000 seconds)
megapixel count excellent (51 megapixels)
great sensor size (Medium format)
supports tracking autofocus
environment sealing
max fps very slow (2.7 fps)
does not have image stabilization
lack of phase detect auto focus
45
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
slow continuous shooting (6.0 fps)
resolution not great (12MP)
bad battery (300 CIPA)
lack of phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C as a Travel photography camera
Olympus E-PL3 as a Travel photography camera
65
environment sealing
provides focus by touch
megapixel count excellent (51 megapixels)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
display isn't selfie friendly
44
no Timelapse recording
bad battery (300 CIPA)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-PL3 as a Landscape photography camera
80
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Hasselblad X mount)
very good size screen (3.60 inch)
megapixel count excellent (51 megapixels)
great sensor size (Medium format)
good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
environment sealing
has dual storage slots
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
61
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
bad battery (300 per charge)
no Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Vlogging features
Olympus E-PL3 Vlogging features
32
touchscreen functionality
high quality video (2720 x 1530 pixels)
does have external mic jack
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
34
image stabilization (Sensor based)
provides face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
no external microphone socket
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL3 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL3
 Hasselblad X1D II 50COlympus PEN E-PL3
General Information
Brand Hasselblad Olympus
Model Hasselblad X1D II 50C Olympus PEN E-PL3
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Introduced 2019-06-19 2011-09-20
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Truepic VI
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Medium format Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 44 x 33mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 1,452.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 51MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 4:3 4:3
Maximum resolution 8272 x 6200 4032 x 3024
Maximum native ISO 25600 12800
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 117 35
Lens
Lens mounting type Hasselblad X Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 13 107
Crop factor 0.8 2.1
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 3.60 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 2,360 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Display tech - HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 3,690 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.87x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/10000 seconds -
Continuous shooting rate 2.7 frames/s 6.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash settings no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels)
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/2000 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 2720 x 1530 (30p) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 2720x1530 1920x1080
Video file format H.264 AVCHD, Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Built-in None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 725g (1.60 lb) 313g (0.69 lb)
Physical dimensions 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") 110 x 64 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 102 52
DXO Color Depth score 26.2 20.9
DXO Dynamic range score 14.8 10.3
DXO Low light score 4489 499
Other
Battery life - 300 shots
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model - BLS-5
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 2 Single
Retail price $5,750 $399