Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL6
60 Imaging
84 Features
74 Overall
80
88 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2019
- Superseded the Hasselblad X1D
- Replacement is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 325g - 111 x 64 x 38mm
- Introduced August 2014
- Newer Model is Olympus E-PL7
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL6 Overview
Below is a complete overview of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Olympus E-PL6, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-PL6 (16MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-PL6 (Four Thirds) offer different sensor size.
Photography GlossaryThe X1D II 50C was introduced 4 years later than the E-PL6 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the X1D II 50C grades vs the E-PL6 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL6 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Olympus PEN E-PL6. The whole galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Olympus E-PL6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-PL6
| X1D II 50C | E-PL6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2019 | August 2014 | More recent by 60 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3.60" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
| Screen resolution | 2360k | 460k | Crisper screen (+1900k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL6 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
| E-PL6 | X1D II 50C | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL6
| X1D II 50C | E-PL6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL6 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has exterior measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL6 has specifications of 111mm x 64mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 325 grams (0.72 lbs).
Compare the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Olympus E-PL6 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the X1D II 50C vs the E-PL6.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and E-PL6 is 60 and 88 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL6 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to imagine the difference in sensor measurements just by researching specs. The graphic below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and E-PL6.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will render more detail using its extra 35MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs more aggressively. The more modern X1D II 50C should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL6 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL6 Specifications
| Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-PL6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Hasselblad | Olympus |
| Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-PL6 |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Introduced | 2019-06-19 | 2014-08-01 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 117 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Number of lenses | 13 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen size | 3.60 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 2,360k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.7 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 725 grams (1.60 pounds) | 325 grams (0.72 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 111 x 64 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | 102 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 360 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | BLS-5 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Two | 1 |
| Price at release | $5,750 | $300 |