Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL7
60 Imaging
84 Features
74 Overall
80
86 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2019
- Previous Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Refreshed by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 357g - 115 x 67 x 38mm
- Introduced September 2014
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL6
- Renewed by Olympus E-PL8
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL7 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Olympus E-PL7, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-PL7 (16MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-PL7 (Four Thirds) use different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe X1D II 50C was brought out 4 years after the E-PL7 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summary of how the X1D II 50C grades vs the E-PL7 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL7 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus PEN E-PL7. The entire galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Olympus E-PL7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-PL7
| X1D II 50C | E-PL7 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2019 | September 2014 | Newer by 59 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3.60" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
| Screen resolution | 2360k | 1037k | Crisper screen (+1323k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL7 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
| E-PL7 | X1D II 50C | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL7
| X1D II 50C | E-PL7 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL7 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C provides outer measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Olympus E-PL7 has sizing of 115mm x 67mm x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 357 grams (0.79 lbs).
Check out the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Olympus E-PL7 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the X1D II 50C vs the E-PL7.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and E-PL7 is 60 and 86 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL7 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by viewing technical specs. The pic below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and E-PL7.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The X1D II 50C due to its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will provide you with extra detail having its extra 35MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent X1D II 50C provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL7 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL7 Specifications
| Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-PL7 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Hasselblad | Olympus |
| Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-PL7 |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2019-06-19 | 2014-09-01 |
| Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 117 | 81 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
| Available lenses | 13 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3.60" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/10000s | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.7 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | 1/2000s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lb) | 357 grams (0.79 lb) |
| Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 115 x 67 x 38mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 102 | 72 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 22.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 12.4 |
| DXO Low light score | 4489 | 873 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BLS-50 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Two | Single |
| Launch pricing | $5,750 | $499 |