Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL9
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


85 Imaging
55 Features
78 Overall
64
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2019
- Previous Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Updated by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
- Released February 2018
- Succeeded the Olympus E-PL8

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL9, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Hasselblad and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-PL9 (16MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-PL9 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor measurements.

The X1D II 50C was released 17 months after the E-PL9 making them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the X1D II 50C matches up vs the E-PL9 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL9 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Olympus PEN E-PL9. The complete galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Olympus E-PL9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-PL9
X1D II 50C | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2019 | ![]() | February 2018 | More modern by 17 months |
Display dimensions | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 1040k | Clearer display (+1320k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
E-PL9 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL9
X1D II 50C | E-PL9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C offers exterior measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL9 has specifications of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).
Examine the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL9 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the X1D II 50C and the E-PL9.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and E-PL9 is 60 and 85 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes simply by checking specifications. The pic underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and E-PL9.
To sum up, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C because of its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 35 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The younger X1D II 50C will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-PL9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-PL9 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2019-06-19 | 2018-02-08 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 13 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3.60" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 2,360 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.7 frames per second | 8.6 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/2000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 pounds) | 380 gr (0.84 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | Dual | One |
Launch pricing | $5,750 | $599 |