Clicky

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL9

Portability
60
Imaging
85
Features
74
Overall
80
Hasselblad X1D II 50C front
 
Olympus PEN E-PL9 front
Portability
85
Imaging
55
Features
78
Overall
64

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL9 Key Specs

Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
  • 51MP - Medium format Sensor
  • 3.60" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 2720 x 1530 video
  • Hasselblad X Mount
  • 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
  • Released June 2019
  • Previous Model is Hasselblad X1D
  • Updated by Hasselblad X2D
Olympus E-PL9
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 6400 (Bump to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 380g - 117 x 68 x 39mm
  • Released February 2018
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-PL8
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL9 Overview

Let's take a deeper look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL9, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Hasselblad and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-PL9 (16MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-PL9 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor measurements.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The X1D II 50C was released 17 months after the E-PL9 making them a generation away from one another. The two cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the X1D II 50C matches up vs the E-PL9 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-PL9

 X1D II 50C E-PL9 
ReleasedJune 2019February 2018More modern by 17 months
Display dimensions3.60"3"Larger display (+0.6")
Display resolution2360k1040kClearer display (+1320k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL9 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C

 E-PL9 X1D II 50C 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display

Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL9

 X1D II 50C E-PL9 
Manual focus More accurate focusing
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch display Easily navigate

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL9 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C offers exterior measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-PL9 has specifications of 117mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 380 grams (0.84 lbs).

Examine the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL9 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the X1D II 50C and the E-PL9.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL9 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and E-PL9 is 60 and 85 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL9 top view buttons comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL9 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes simply by checking specifications. The pic underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and E-PL9.

To sum up, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C because of its larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 35 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The younger X1D II 50C will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL9 sensor size comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and ViewFinder

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Portrait photography with Olympus E-PL9
91
has manual focus
high flash sync (1/2,000s)
MP count fantastic (51 megapixels)
big sensor size (Medium format)
delivers RAW files
73
focusing manually
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has face detect focus
exports RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Street photography highlights
Olympus E-PL9 Street photography highlights
69
big sensor size (Medium format)
delivers RAW files
comes with touch to focus
weather proofing
great ISO range (25,600)
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
84
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
provides focus by touch
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sports photography information
Olympus E-PL9 Sports photography information
73
quiet shutter (1/10,000 seconds)
MP count fantastic (51 megapixels)
big sensor size (Medium format)
offers tracking focus
weather proofing
slow continuous shooting (2.7 fps)
does not have image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
69
silent mode (1/16,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
no phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Travel photography highlights
Olympus E-PL9 Travel photography highlights
65
weather proofing
comes with touch to focus
MP count fantastic (51 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse mode
does not offer selfie friendly display
77
connects via bluetooth
provides focus by touch
decent MP (16MP)
has built in flash
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Landscape photography with Olympus E-PL9
80
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Hasselblad X mount)
screen larger than average (3.60 inch)
MP count fantastic (51 megapixels)
big sensor size (Medium format)
great ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
weather proofing
2 card slots
does not have image stabilization
missing Time Lapse mode
80
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C as a Vlogging camera
Olympus E-PL9 as a Vlogging camera
32
touchscreen enabled
high res video (2720 x 1530 pxls)
does have mic support
does not offer selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
35
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
has face detect focus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
doesn't have mic port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PL9 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PL9
 Hasselblad X1D II 50COlympus PEN E-PL9
General Information
Make Hasselblad Olympus
Model Hasselblad X1D II 50C Olympus PEN E-PL9
Type Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2019-06-19 2018-02-08
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - TruePic VIII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Medium format Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 44 x 33mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor area 1,452.0mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 51 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 8272 x 6200 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Maximum boosted ISO - 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW photos
Minimum boosted ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 117 121
Lens
Lens mount Hasselblad X Micro Four Thirds
Total lenses 13 107
Crop factor 0.8 2.1
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 3.60" 3"
Resolution of screen 2,360 thousand dot 1,040 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 3,690 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.87x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Highest silent shutter speed 1/10000 secs 1/16000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 2.7 frames per second 8.6 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash 7.60 m (at ISO 200)
Flash options no built-in flash Auto, manual, redeye reduction, slow sync w/redeye reduction, slow sync , slow sync 2nd-curtain, fill-in, off
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/2000 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 2720 x 1530 (30p) 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution 2720x1530 3840x2160
Video data format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Built-in None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 725 gr (1.60 pounds) 380 gr (0.84 pounds)
Physical dimensions 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") 117 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 102 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 26.2 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 14.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 4489 not tested
Other
Battery life - 350 photographs
Battery form - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported)
Storage slots Dual One
Launch pricing $5,750 $599