Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PM1
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


89 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PM1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2019
- Older Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Later Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced November 2011
- Successor is Olympus E-PM2

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PM1 Overview
Following is a comprehensive overview of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Olympus E-PM1, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and E-PM1 (12MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and E-PM1 (Four Thirds) feature different sensor sizing.

The X1D II 50C was manufactured 7 years after the E-PM1 which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the X1D II 50C grades against the E-PM1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PM1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus PEN E-PM1. The entire galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Olympus E-PM1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Olympus E-PM1
X1D II 50C | E-PM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2019 | ![]() | November 2011 | More modern by 93 months |
Display sizing | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+1900k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
E-PM1 | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Olympus E-PM1
X1D II 50C | E-PM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PM1 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has exterior measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Olympus E-PM1 has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs).
Examine the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Olympus E-PM1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select during that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the X1D II 50C vs the E-PM1.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and E-PM1 is 60 and 89 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PM1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor sizes only by reading through specifications. The image underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and E-PM1.
Plainly, the 2 cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will give you greater detail due to its extra 39 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher X1D II 50C provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PM1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Olympus E-PM1 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Olympus |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Olympus PEN E-PM1 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2019-06-19 | 2011-11-23 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4032 x 3024 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 13 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.60" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 2,360 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/10000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.7 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lb) | 265 gr (0.58 lb) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 102 | 52 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 21.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 10.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 499 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Two | Single |
Launch price | $5,750 | $499 |