Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF3
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


90 Imaging
47 Features
48 Overall
47
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2019
- Replaced the Hasselblad X1D
- Newer Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 264g - 108 x 67 x 32mm
- Released August 2011
- Previous Model is Panasonic GF2
- Successor is Panasonic GF5

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF3 Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF3, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Hasselblad and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and GF3 (12MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and GF3 (Four Thirds) posses different sensor measurements.

The X1D II 50C was brought out 7 years after the GF3 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the X1D II 50C grades versus the GF3 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3. The entire galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Panasonic GF3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Panasonic GF3
X1D II 50C | GF3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2019 | ![]() | August 2011 | Newer by 96 months |
Screen size | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
Screen resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+1900k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF3 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
GF3 | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic GF3
X1D II 50C | GF3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF3 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C provides exterior dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GF3 has measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 264 grams (0.58 lbs).
Look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the X1D II 50C compared to the GF3.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and GF3 is 60 and 90 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF3 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading specifications. The picture underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D II 50C and GF3.
Plainly, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The X1D II 50C because of its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will offer you greater detail having its extra 39 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more modern X1D II 50C provides an advantage in sensor innovation.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF3 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF3 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Hasselblad | Panasonic |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2019-06-19 | 2011-08-11 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 160 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 13 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.60 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 2,360k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/10000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.7 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.30 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/2000s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lb) | 264 grams (0.58 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 108 x 67 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | 50 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 20.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 459 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 2 | 1 |
Cost at release | $5,750 | $360 |