Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF5
60 Imaging
86 Features
74 Overall
81
89 Imaging
49 Features
54 Overall
51
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2019
- Previous Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Updated by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 267g - 108 x 67 x 37mm
- Announced April 2012
- Replaced the Panasonic GF3
- Renewed by Panasonic GF6
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF5 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic GF5, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and GF5 (12MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and GF5 (Four Thirds) come with totally different sensor sizes.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe X1D II 50C was released 7 years after the GF5 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the X1D II 50C matches up against the GF5 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5. The complete galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Panasonic GF5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Panasonic GF5
X1D II 50C | GF5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2019 | April 2012 | More modern by 88 months | |
Display dimension | 3.60" | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
Display resolution | 2360k | 920k | Clearer display (+1440k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF5 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
GF5 | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic GF5
X1D II 50C | GF5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF5 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C offers outer measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GF5 has measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.5") having a weight of 267 grams (0.59 lbs).
Compare the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic GF5 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the X1D II 50C against the GF5.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and GF5 is 60 and 89 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF5 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizes just by reviewing specifications. The picture underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and GF5.
Plainly, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 39 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The younger X1D II 50C will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF5 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Panasonic |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF5 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2019-06-19 | 2012-04-05 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 160 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 13 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3.60 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 2,360k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.7 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.30 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 lb) | 267g (0.59 lb) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 108 x 67 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 102 | 50 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 20.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 10.0 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 573 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 2 | 1 |
Launch cost | $5,750 | $600 |