Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF6
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


87 Imaging
52 Features
64 Overall
56
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Revealed June 2019
- Old Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Refreshed by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 323g - 111 x 65 x 38mm
- Introduced April 2013
- Earlier Model is Panasonic GF5
- Newer Model is Panasonic GF7

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF6 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Panasonic GF6, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Hasselblad and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and GF6 (16MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and GF6 (Four Thirds) posses different sensor sizing.

The X1D II 50C was announced 6 years later than the GF6 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the X1D II 50C grades versus the GF6 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF6 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF6. The whole galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Panasonic GF6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Panasonic GF6
X1D II 50C | GF6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2019 | ![]() | April 2013 | More recent by 76 months |
Display size | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 1040k | Crisper display (+1320k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF6 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
GF6 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic GF6
X1D II 50C | GF6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF6 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C offers outer dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GF6 has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 323 grams (0.71 lbs).
Check out the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Panasonic GF6 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the X1D II 50C compared to the GF6.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and GF6 is 60 and 87 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF6 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements merely by going over specifications. The photograph below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D II 50C and GF6.
Plainly, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C using its larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will deliver greater detail with its extra 35MP. Greater resolution will help you crop photos way more aggressively. The more modern X1D II 50C provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF6 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF6 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF6 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Panasonic |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF6 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2019-06-19 | 2013-04-08 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4592 x 3448 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 160 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Total lenses | 13 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3.60 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 2,360 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/10000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.7 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.30 m |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/2000s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60i PsF/30p in NTSC models, 50i PsF/25p on PAL), 1280 x 720p (60i PsF/30p in NTSC models, 50i PsF/25p on PAL), 640 x 480 (30/25fps) |
Highest video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 pounds) | 323 grams (0.71 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 111 x 65 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | 54 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 20.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 10.6 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 622 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Dual | 1 |
Retail price | $5,750 | $326 |