Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF7
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


90 Imaging
53 Features
66 Overall
58
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2019
- Older Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Updated by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- 1/16000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 266g - 107 x 65 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Previous Model is Panasonic GF6
- Successor is Panasonic GF8

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF7 Overview
The following is a complete review of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF7, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Hasselblad and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and GF7 (16MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and GF7 (Four Thirds) come with different sensor sizing.

The X1D II 50C was manufactured 4 years after the GF7 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the X1D II 50C matches up against the GF7 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF7 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF7. The entire galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Panasonic GF7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Panasonic GF7
X1D II 50C | GF7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2019 | ![]() | February 2015 | Newer by 54 months |
Display sizing | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 1040k | Sharper display (+1320k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF7 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
GF7 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic GF7
X1D II 50C | GF7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF7 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C features exterior dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Panasonic GF7 has sizing of 107mm x 65mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 266 grams (0.59 lbs).
See the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF7 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the X1D II 50C versus the GF7.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and GF7 is 60 and 90 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF7 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to picture the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading a spec sheet. The picture below will offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D II 50C and GF7.
As you can see, the two cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The X1D II 50C because of its larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will offer you more detail due to its extra 35MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger X1D II 50C should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF7 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF7 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Panasonic |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF7 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2019-06-19 | 2015-02-01 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4592 x 3448 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 13 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3.60" | 3" |
Display resolution | 2,360k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.7fps | 5.8fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, flash off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/2000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 50p, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Highest video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 pounds) | 266g (0.59 pounds) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 107 x 65 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 images |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3-shot/10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Two | Single |
Price at launch | $5,750 | $308 |