Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF8
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
90 Imaging
54 Features
62 Overall
57
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Announced June 2019
- Old Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Successor is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 266g - 107 x 65 x 33mm
- Announced February 2016
- Older Model is Panasonic GF7
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF8 Overview
Here is a in depth comparison of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic GF8, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and GF8 (16MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and GF8 (Four Thirds) come with totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe X1D II 50C was revealed 3 years later than the GF8 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short introduction of how the X1D II 50C scores versus the GF8 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF8 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8. The full galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Panasonic GF8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Panasonic GF8
X1D II 50C | GF8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2019 | February 2016 | Fresher by 41 months | |
Screen sizing | 3.60" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 1040k | Sharper screen (+1320k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF8 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
GF8 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic GF8
X1D II 50C | GF8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF8 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C offers external dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GF8 has proportions of 107mm x 65mm x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 266 grams (0.59 lbs).
Take a look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic GF8 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the X1D II 50C versus the GF8.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and GF8 is 60 and 90 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF8 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing simply by going through technical specs. The graphic below should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D II 50C and GF8.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The X1D II 50C using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will provide extra detail because of its extra 35 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The more modern X1D II 50C will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF8 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GF8 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Hasselblad | Panasonic |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF8 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2019-06-19 | 2016-02-15 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4592 x 3448 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 13 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3.60" | 3" |
Display resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/500s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/10000s | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.7 frames per sec | 5.8 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.60 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, flash on, flash on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, flash off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 50p, 50i, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 lbs) | 266g (0.59 lbs) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 107 x 65 x 33mm (4.2" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3-shot/10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 2 | One |
Price at release | $5,750 | $549 |