Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GH4
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
66 Imaging
53 Features
88 Overall
67
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GH4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Revealed June 2019
- Earlier Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Renewed by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 560g - 133 x 93 x 84mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Superseded the Panasonic GH3
- Updated by Panasonic GH5
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GH4 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GH4, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by brands Hasselblad and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and GH4 (16MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and GH4 (Four Thirds) offer different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe X1D II 50C was manufactured 5 years after the GH4 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic GH4 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the X1D II 50C scores versus the GH4 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GH4 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4. The entire galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Panasonic GH4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Panasonic GH4
X1D II 50C | GH4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2019 | February 2014 | Newer by 66 months | |
Screen size | 3.60" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 1036k | Clearer screen (+1324k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GH4 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
GH4 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic GH4
X1D II 50C | GH4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GH4 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C offers exterior measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GH4 has sizing of 133mm x 93mm x 84mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 3.3") having a weight of 560 grams (1.23 lbs).
Take a look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GH4 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. Below is a front view scale comparison of the X1D II 50C against the GH4.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and GH4 is 60 and 66 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GH4 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions only by reading through a spec sheet. The image here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and GH4.
As you can see, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The X1D II 50C due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will give greater detail due to its extra 35MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The younger X1D II 50C should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GH4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GH4 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Panasonic |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2019-06-19 | 2014-02-07 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine IX |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 13 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3.60" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 2,360k dot | 1,036k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dot | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.67x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/10000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.7fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 17.00 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, auto/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync/redeye reduction, forced off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/2000s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 4096 x 2160 (24p), 3840 x 2160 (24p, 25p, 30p), 1920 x 1080 (24p, 25p, 30p, 50p, 60p), 1280 x 720 (24p, 25p, 30p), 640 x 480 (25p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 lbs) | 560g (1.23 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 133 x 93 x 84mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 102 | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 23.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 12.8 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 791 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DMW-BLF19 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs (single or three-shot)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 2 | One |
Cost at launch | $5,750 | $1,500 |