Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GH5
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
59 Imaging
59 Features
89 Overall
71
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GH5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2019
- Previous Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Replacement is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 725g - 139 x 98 x 87mm
- Introduced January 2017
- Replaced the Panasonic GH4
- Updated by Panasonic GH5 II
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GH5 Overview
Below is a comprehensive analysis of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic GH5, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by companies Hasselblad and Panasonic. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and GH5 (20MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and GH5 (Four Thirds) feature different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe X1D II 50C was announced 2 years later than the GH5 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic GH5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a quick summation of how the X1D II 50C scores vs the GH5 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GH5 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH5. The whole galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Panasonic GH5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Panasonic GH5
X1D II 50C | GH5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2019 | January 2017 | More recent by 30 months | |
Screen sizing | 3.60" | 3.2" | Bigger screen (+0.4") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 1620k | Sharper screen (+740k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GH5 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
GH5 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic GH5
X1D II 50C | GH5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GH5 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera often, you need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C comes with external measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Panasonic GH5 has dimensions of 139mm x 98mm x 87mm (5.5" x 3.9" x 3.4") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs).
Contrast the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic GH5 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at the time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the X1D II 50C compared to the GH5.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and GH5 is 60 and 59 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GH5 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to imagine the difference between sensor measurements just by reading through specifications. The visual underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and GH5.
Plainly, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will resolve extra detail with its extra 31MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs far more aggressively. The more recent X1D II 50C provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GH5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GH5 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Panasonic |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH5 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Released | 2019-06-19 | 2017-01-04 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | 225 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 13 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3.60" | 3.2" |
Display resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 1,620 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | 3,680 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.76x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/10000s | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.7fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, Auto/Redeye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On w/Redeye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync w/Redeye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 4096 x 2160 (24p), 3840 x 2160 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) |
Highest video resolution | 2720x1530 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1(5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 pounds) | 725 gr (1.60 pounds) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 139 x 98 x 87mm (5.5" x 3.9" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | 77 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 23.9 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 13.0 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 807 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 images |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs; 10 secs w/3 shots) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II compatible) |
Card slots | Dual | Dual |
Retail price | $5,750 | $1,298 |