Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GX1
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


87 Imaging
51 Features
54 Overall
52
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Revealed June 2019
- Succeeded the Hasselblad X1D
- Renewed by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 318g - 116 x 68 x 39mm
- Launched February 2012
- Later Model is Panasonic GX7

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GX1 Overview
The following is a comprehensive overview of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic GX1, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and GX1 (16MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and GX1 (Four Thirds) have different sensor size.

The X1D II 50C was brought out 7 years after the GX1 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a complete comparison, here is a quick summary of how the X1D II 50C scores vs the GX1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GX1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1. The entire galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Panasonic GX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Panasonic GX1
X1D II 50C | GX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2019 | ![]() | February 2012 | Newer by 90 months |
Display size | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+1900k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX1 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
GX1 | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic GX1
X1D II 50C | GX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GX1 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has got external measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Panasonic GX1 has dimensions of 116mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") along with a weight of 318 grams (0.70 lbs).
Analyze the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic GX1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the X1D II 50C vs the GX1.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and GX1 is 60 and 87 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GX1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions simply by looking at technical specs. The pic here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and GX1.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The X1D II 50C featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will give you greater detail having its extra 35 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The newer X1D II 50C provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GX1 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GX1 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Hasselblad | Panasonic |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2019-06-19 | 2012-02-14 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4592 x 3448 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 160 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 13 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.60" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 2,360 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/10000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.7fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.60 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lb) | 318 grams (0.70 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 116 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 102 | 55 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 20.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 10.6 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 703 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Pricing at release | $5,750 | $228 |