Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GX8
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
74 Imaging
59 Features
84 Overall
69
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GX8 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2019
- Old Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Later Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 487g - 133 x 78 x 63mm
- Released July 2015
- Superseded the Panasonic GX7
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GX8 Overview
Below is a complete overview of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic GX8, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Hasselblad and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and GX8 (20MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and GX8 (Four Thirds) come with different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe X1D II 50C was introduced 3 years later than the GX8 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the X1D II 50C grades vs the GX8 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GX8 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8. The whole galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Panasonic GX8 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Panasonic GX8
X1D II 50C | GX8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2019 | July 2015 | More recent by 48 months | |
Display dimension | 3.60" | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
Display resolution | 2360k | 1040k | Crisper display (+1320k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX8 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
GX8 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic GX8
X1D II 50C | GX8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GX8 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has got outer dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Panasonic GX8 has sizing of 133mm x 78mm x 63mm (5.2" x 3.1" x 2.5") with a weight of 487 grams (1.07 lbs).
Contrast the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic GX8 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the X1D II 50C versus the GX8.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and GX8 is 60 and 74 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GX8 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements simply by viewing a spec sheet. The visual underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D II 50C and GX8.
Clearly, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will provide you with extra detail using its extra 31MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The more recent X1D II 50C should have an edge in sensor technology.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GX8 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GX8 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Panasonic |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2019-06-19 | 2015-07-16 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 13 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3.60" | 3" |
Display resolution | 2,360k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.7 frames per sec | 12.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 2720x1530 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 pounds) | 487g (1.07 pounds) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 133 x 78 x 63mm (5.2" x 3.1" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | 75 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 23.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 806 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Dual | Single |
Pricing at launch | $5,750 | $898 |