Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GX85
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


83 Imaging
54 Features
76 Overall
62
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GX85 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2019
- Succeeded the Hasselblad X1D
- Replacement is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 426g - 122 x 71 x 44mm
- Revealed April 2016
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-GX80 / Lumix DMC-GX7 Mark II

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GX85 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic GX85, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Hasselblad and Panasonic. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and GX85 (16MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and GX85 (Four Thirds) come with different sensor sizes.

The X1D II 50C was released 3 years after the GX85 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving in to a thorough comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the X1D II 50C grades against the GX85 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GX85 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85. The complete galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Panasonic GX85 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Panasonic GX85
X1D II 50C | GX85 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2019 | ![]() | April 2016 | More modern by 39 months |
Screen dimension | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
Screen resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 1040k | Clearer screen (+1320k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX85 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
GX85 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic GX85
X1D II 50C | GX85 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GX85 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C offers outer measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GX85 has sizing of 122mm x 71mm x 44mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Take a look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Panasonic GX85 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the X1D II 50C versus the GX85.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and GX85 is 60 and 83 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GX85 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes purely by checking technical specs. The image here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and GX85.
As you can tell, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will give you greater detail as a result of its extra 35 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent X1D II 50C should have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GX85 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Panasonic GX85 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Hasselblad | Panasonic |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX85 |
Alternative name | - | Lumix DMC-GX80 / Lumix DMC-GX7 Mark II |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2019-06-19 | 2016-04-05 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4592 x 3448 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 13 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3.60 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 2,360k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dot | 2,764k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/10000 seconds | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.7 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lbs) | 426 gr (0.94 lbs) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 122 x 71 x 44mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | 71 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 662 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Dual | One |
Retail price | $5,750 | $800 |