Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Pentax Q-S1
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2019
- Old Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Updated by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Launched August 2014
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Following is a extensive overview of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Pentax Q-S1, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Hasselblad and Pentax. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and Q-S1 (12MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and Q-S1 (1/1.7") offer different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe X1D II 50C was launched 4 years after the Q-S1 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the X1D II 50C scores versus the Q-S1 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Pentax Q-S1. The complete galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Pentax Q-S1
X1D II 50C | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2019 | August 2014 | More modern by 60 months | |
Display dimensions | 3.60" | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
Display resolution | 2360k | 460k | Crisper display (+1900k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Q-S1 | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Pentax Q-S1
X1D II 50C | Q-S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has external dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Pentax Q-S1 has proportions of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Pentax Q-S1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the X1D II 50C vs the Q-S1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and Q-S1 is 60 and 92 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor sizes merely by looking at specs. The pic below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D II 50C and Q-S1.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will give greater detail utilizing its extra 39MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The newer X1D II 50C should have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Pentax Q-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Hasselblad | Pentax |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Pentax Q-S1 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2019-06-19 | 2014-08-04 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Q Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Pentax Q |
Total lenses | 13 | 8 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.60" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/10000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.7fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
Max video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 pounds) | 203 gr (0.45 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI68 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Two | Single |
Launch price | $5,750 | $250 |