Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2019
- Earlier Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Refreshed by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Introduced November 2009

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Hasselblad and Ricoh. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) provide different sensor dimensions.

The X1D II 50C was manufactured 9 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the X1D II 50C scores vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The entire galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
X1D II 50C | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2019 | ![]() | November 2009 | Newer by 117 months |
Screen dimensions | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
Screen resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper screen (+1440k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
X1D II 50C | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C offers outer measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Compare the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the X1D II 50C vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 60 and 77 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specifications. The image here should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Plainly, the 2 cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The X1D II 50C because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will produce more detail due to its extra 39MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more recent X1D II 50C should have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Ricoh |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2019-06-19 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 117 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 50mm (1x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 13 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3.60 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 180 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/10000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.7 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 lbs) | 453g (1.00 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 2 | Single |
Retail cost | $5,750 | $566 |