Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2019
- Older Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Renewed by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Launched March 2010
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Hasselblad and Ricoh. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") have different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe X1D II 50C was unveiled 9 years after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the X1D II 50C scores against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The full galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
X1D II 50C | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2019 | March 2010 | Newer by 113 months | |
Screen size | 3.60" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 920k | Sharper screen (+1440k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
X1D II 50C | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C enjoys outside measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Contrast the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the X1D II 50C against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 60 and 85 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions only by checking a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Clearly, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The X1D II 50C with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will resolve greater detail having an extra 41MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more modern X1D II 50C provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Ricoh |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2019-06-19 | 2010-03-18 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Medium format | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 117 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Hasselblad X | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 13 | - |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3.60" | 3" |
Display resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 180s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/10000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.7 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 2720x1530 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lb) | 355 gr (0.78 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 pictures |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Dual | Single |
Retail price | $5,750 | $349 |