Clicky

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
60
Imaging
85
Features
74
Overall
80
Hasselblad X1D II 50C front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
  • 51MP - Medium format Sensor
  • 3.60" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 2720 x 1530 video
  • Hasselblad X Mount
  • 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
  • Launched June 2019
  • Older Model is Hasselblad X1D
  • Renewed by Hasselblad X2D
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Launched March 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

The following is a detailed analysis of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Hasselblad and Ricoh. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") have different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The X1D II 50C was unveiled 9 years after the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the X1D II 50C scores against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 X1D II 50C GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
LaunchedJune 2019March 2010Newer by 113 months
Screen size3.60"3"Bigger screen (+0.6")
Screen resolution2360k920kSharper screen (+1440k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC X1D II 50C 

Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 X1D II 50C GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Manually focus More accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C enjoys outside measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") and a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Contrast the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the X1D II 50C against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 60 and 85 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be difficult to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions only by checking a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Clearly, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The X1D II 50C with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will resolve greater detail having an extra 41MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs way more aggressively. The more modern X1D II 50C provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Portrait photography information
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography information
91
has manual focus
great flash sync speed (1/2,000 seconds)
excellent sensor resolution (51 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Medium format)
exports RAW formats
36
focusing manually
delivers RAW formats
no liveview
low resolution (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Street photography camera
69
sensor size is great (Medium format)
exports RAW formats
provides touch focus
weather proof
above average ISO range (25,600)
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (355g)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Sports photography camera
73
silent mode (1/10,000 seconds)
excellent sensor resolution (51MP)
sensor size is great (Medium format)
provides tracking autofocus
weather proof
max fps very slow (2.7 fps)
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect auto focus
25
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no liveview
max frames per second very slow (2.0 fps)
low resolution (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
has no phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Travel photography info
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography info
65
weather proof
provides touch focus
excellent sensor resolution (51 megapixels)
does not have Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
60
lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
low resolution (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Landscape photography advice
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography advice
80
has manual focus
swap lenses (Hasselblad X mount)
big screen (3.60 inch)
excellent sensor resolution (51 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Medium format)
above average ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
weather proof
two card slots
lack of image stabilization
does not have Timelapse recording
47
focusing manually
quite wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW formats
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
no liveview
low resolution (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Vlogging factors
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging factors
32
touchscreen
high quality video (2720 x 1530 pixels)
does have external microphone socket
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
28
quite wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
display is not selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
missing mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Hasselblad X1D II 50CRicoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Make Hasselblad Ricoh
Model type Hasselblad X1D II 50C Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Class Pro Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2019-06-19 2010-03-18
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Medium format 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 44 x 33mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 1,452.0mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 51 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 8272 x 6200 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 117 -
Lens
Lens support Hasselblad X fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-72mm (3.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.5-4.4
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Total lenses 13 -
Crop factor 0.8 4.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3.60" 3"
Display resolution 2,360 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 3,690 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.87x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 180s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/10000s -
Continuous shutter speed 2.7 frames per sec 2.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 4.50 m
Flash settings no built-in flash Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/2000s -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 2720 x 1530 (30p) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 2720x1530 640x480
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Built-in None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 725 gr (1.60 lb) 355 gr (0.78 lb)
Physical dimensions 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 102 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 26.2 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 14.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 4489 not tested
Other
Battery life - 410 pictures
Battery form - Battery Pack
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Dual Single
Retail price $5,750 $349