Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX mini
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


93 Imaging
51 Features
68 Overall
57
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX mini Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Announced June 2019
- Replaced the Hasselblad X1D
- Successor is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 20.5MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- 1/16000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX-M Mount
- 196g - 110 x 62 x 23mm
- Announced March 2014

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX mini Overview
On this page, we are analyzing the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX mini, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Hasselblad and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and NX mini (20.5MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and NX mini (1") boast totally different sensor size.

The X1D II 50C was brought out 5 years after the NX mini which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the X1D II 50C grades versus the NX mini in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX mini Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Samsung NX mini. The entire galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Samsung NX mini Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Samsung NX mini
X1D II 50C | NX mini | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2019 | ![]() | March 2014 | Newer by 64 months |
Display dimensions | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 461k | Clearer display (+1899k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX mini over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
NX mini | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Samsung NX mini
X1D II 50C | NX mini | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX mini Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and volume. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C features exterior measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Samsung NX mini has sizing of 110mm x 62mm x 23mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 196 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX mini in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the X1D II 50C against the NX mini.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and NX mini is 60 and 93 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX mini Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions simply by looking at technical specs. The pic underneath will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and NX mini.
As you can tell, both the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The X1D II 50C because of its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will give you more detail having its extra 30.5 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The younger X1D II 50C is going to have an edge in sensor tech.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX mini Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX mini Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Samsung NX mini | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Samsung |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Samsung NX mini |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2019-06-19 | 2014-03-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 20.5MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 160 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Samsung NX-M |
Available lenses | 13 | 2 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3.60 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 2,360k dot | 461k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT-LCD (180 degree tilt) |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/16000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.7fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Smart Flash, auto, auto + redeye reduction, fill-in, fill-in + redeye reduction, 1st curtain, 2nd curtain |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/2000 secs | 1/200 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 (all 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 lb) | 196g (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 110 x 62 x 23mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 650 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | B740 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2-30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Storage slots | 2 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $5,750 | $530 |