Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX1
60 Imaging
86 Features
74 Overall
81
66 Imaging
68 Features
90 Overall
76
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Revealed June 2019
- Succeeded the Hasselblad X1D
- New Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 28MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 550g - 139 x 102 x 66mm
- Announced September 2014
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX1 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Samsung NX1, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by competitors Hasselblad and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and NX1 (28MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and NX1 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe X1D II 50C was launched 4 years later than the NX1 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the X1D II 50C scores versus the NX1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Samsung NX1. The complete galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Samsung NX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Samsung NX1
X1D II 50C | NX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2019 | September 2014 | More recent by 58 months | |
Display dimension | 3.60" | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
Display resolution | 2360k | 1036k | Crisper display (+1324k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX1 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
NX1 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Samsung NX1
X1D II 50C | NX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX1 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and volume. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C enjoys physical dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Samsung NX1 has sizing of 139mm x 102mm x 66mm (5.5" x 4.0" x 2.6") with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Analyze the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Samsung NX1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the X1D II 50C against the NX1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and NX1 is 60 and 66 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by researching technical specs. The graphic here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D II 50C and NX1.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C due to its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will render greater detail utilizing its extra 23MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos much more aggressively. The younger X1D II 50C should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX1 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Samsung NX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Samsung |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Samsung NX1 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2019-06-19 | 2014-09-15 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | DRIMe 5 |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 28 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 6480 x 4320 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 209 |
Cross type focus points | - | 153 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Samsung NX |
Number of lenses | 13 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3.60 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 1,036 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/10000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.7 frames per sec | 15.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 11.00 m (ISO 100) |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 4096 x 2160 (24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.265 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lb) | 550 grams (1.21 lb) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 139 x 102 x 66mm (5.5" x 4.0" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | 83 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 24.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 13.2 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 1363 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 500 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BP1900 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II) |
Card slots | 2 | One |
Launch cost | $5,750 | $1,500 |