Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX200
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2019
- Succeeded the Hasselblad X1D
- Later Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Launched February 2012
- Succeeded the Samsung NX100
- Replacement is Samsung NX210
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX200 Overview
Below is a extended comparison of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Samsung NX200, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Hasselblad and Samsung. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and NX200 (20MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and NX200 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe X1D II 50C was brought out 7 years later than the NX200 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the X1D II 50C grades versus the NX200 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Samsung NX200. The entire galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Samsung NX200
X1D II 50C | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2019 | February 2012 | More recent by 89 months | |
Screen dimension | 3.60" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 614k | Sharper screen (+1746k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
NX200 | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Samsung NX200
X1D II 50C | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has outside dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Samsung NX200 has dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") along with a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Samsung NX200 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the X1D II 50C versus the NX200.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and NX200 is 60 and 90 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to visualise the difference in sensor measurements just by viewing specs. The graphic below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D II 50C and NX200.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C featuring a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will result in greater detail having its extra 31MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more modern X1D II 50C will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Samsung NX200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Samsung |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Samsung NX200 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2019-06-19 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Samsung NX |
Amount of lenses | 13 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.60" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/10000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.7fps | 7.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/2000s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 lbs) | 223g (0.49 lbs) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | 69 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 618 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Price at release | $5,750 | $818 |