Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX2000
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


89 Imaging
62 Features
68 Overall
64
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2019
- Replaced the Hasselblad X1D
- Successor is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Introduced November 2013
- Replaced the Samsung NX1100
- Renewed by Samsung NX3000

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX2000 Overview
The following is a in depth review of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Samsung NX2000, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and NX2000 (20MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and NX2000 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizes.

The X1D II 50C was released 5 years after the NX2000 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief summary of how the X1D II 50C grades against the NX2000 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX2000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Samsung NX2000. The complete galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Samsung NX2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Samsung NX2000
X1D II 50C | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2019 | ![]() | November 2013 | Newer by 68 months |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 1152k | Sharper display (+1208k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
NX2000 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3.7" | ![]() | 3.60" | Larger display (+0.1") |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Samsung NX2000
X1D II 50C | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison
When you are going to travel with your camera, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C comes with outside measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX2000 has proportions of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Samsung NX2000 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the X1D II 50C against the NX2000.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and NX2000 is 60 and 89 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions simply by viewing technical specs. The image underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and NX2000.
As you have seen, both of those cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The X1D II 50C because of its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 31MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The newer X1D II 50C will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Samsung NX2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Samsung |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Samsung NX2000 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2019-06-19 | 2013-11-30 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Samsung NX |
Available lenses | 13 | 32 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3.60" | 3.7" |
Resolution of display | 2,360k dots | 1,152k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/10000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.7 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/2000s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lbs) | 228 gr (0.50 lbs) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | 75 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 908 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 340 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Cost at release | $5,750 | $599 |