Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX210
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2019
- Replaced the Hasselblad X1D
- Successor is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 117 x 63 x 37mm
- Launched August 2012
- Replaced the Samsung NX200
- Renewed by Samsung NX300

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX210 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Samsung NX210, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Hasselblad and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and NX210 (20MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and NX210 (APS-C) posses different sensor size.

The X1D II 50C was launched 6 years later than the NX210 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the X1D II 50C grades vs the NX210 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX210 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Samsung NX210. The complete galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Samsung NX210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Samsung NX210
X1D II 50C | NX210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2019 | ![]() | August 2012 | More recent by 84 months |
Screen dimensions | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
Screen resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 614k | Clearer screen (+1746k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX210 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
NX210 | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Samsung NX210
X1D II 50C | NX210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX210 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has got exterior measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Samsung NX210 has proportions of 117mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Samsung NX210 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view scale comparison of the X1D II 50C and the NX210.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and NX210 is 60 and 90 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX210 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements purely by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and NX210.
As you can see, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 31 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern X1D II 50C provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX210 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX210 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Samsung NX210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Hasselblad | Samsung |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Samsung NX210 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2019-06-19 | 2012-08-14 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Hasselblad X | Samsung NX |
Available lenses | 13 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3.60 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 2,360 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.7 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 pounds) | 222 grams (0.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 117 x 63 x 37mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 102 | 71 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 719 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 2 | Single |
Cost at launch | $5,750 | $625 |