Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX3000
60 Imaging
86 Features
74 Overall
81
89 Imaging
63 Features
62 Overall
62
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Revealed June 2019
- Previous Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Successor is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
- Introduced May 2014
- Earlier Model is Samsung NX2000
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX3000 Overview
Below is a in depth comparison of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Samsung NX3000, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and NX3000 (20MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and NX3000 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe X1D II 50C was brought out 5 years later than the NX3000 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a brief view of how the X1D II 50C grades vs the NX3000 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX3000 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Samsung NX3000. The entire galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Samsung NX3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Samsung NX3000
X1D II 50C | NX3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2019 | May 2014 | More recent by 62 months | |
Display dimension | 3.60" | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
Display resolution | 2360k | 461k | Sharper display (+1899k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
NX3000 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Samsung NX3000
X1D II 50C | NX3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C provides external measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX3000 has specifications of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Samsung NX3000 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the X1D II 50C versus the NX3000.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and NX3000 is 60 and 89 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to envision the gap between sensor measurements only by reading specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and NX3000.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C because of its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will offer greater detail having its extra 31 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The younger X1D II 50C will have a benefit in sensor tech.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Samsung NX3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Samsung |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Samsung NX3000 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2019-06-19 | 2014-05-26 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | 35 |
Cross focus points | - | 1 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Samsung NX |
Total lenses | 13 | 32 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3.60" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 2,360 thousand dots | 461 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.7 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | B740 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2-30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Card slots | 2 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $5,750 | $897 |