Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX500
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


87 Imaging
67 Features
80 Overall
72
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2019
- Replaced the Hasselblad X1D
- Successor is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 28MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 287g - 120 x 64 x 43mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Succeeded the Samsung NX300

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX500 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Samsung NX500, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Hasselblad and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and NX500 (28MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and NX500 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizes.

The X1D II 50C was introduced 4 years later than the NX500 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the X1D II 50C matches up against the NX500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX500 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Samsung NX500. The whole galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Samsung NX500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Samsung NX500
X1D II 50C | NX500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2019 | ![]() | February 2015 | More recent by 54 months |
Display dimensions | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 1036k | Crisper display (+1324k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX500 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
NX500 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Samsung NX500
X1D II 50C | NX500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX500 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C provides outer measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX500 has dimensions of 120mm x 64mm x 43mm (4.7" x 2.5" x 1.7") with a weight of 287 grams (0.63 lbs).
Compare the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Samsung NX500 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the X1D II 50C against the NX500.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and NX500 is 60 and 87 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX500 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and NX500.
Clearly, both of those cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C with its larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will give you extra detail using its extra 23MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more recent X1D II 50C is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX500 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Samsung NX500 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Samsung NX500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Samsung |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Samsung NX500 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2019-06-19 | 2015-02-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | DRIMe 5 |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 28 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 6480 x 4320 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 209 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Hasselblad X | Samsung NX |
Total lenses | 13 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3.60" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 2,360k dot | 1,036k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.7 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Smart flash, auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill flash, fill w/redeye reduction, 1st-curtain, 2nd-curtain, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/2000 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 4096 x 2160 (24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | H.265 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 lb) | 287g (0.63 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 120 x 64 x 43mm (4.7" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 102 | 87 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 24.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 13.9 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 1379 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 370 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Dual | 1 |
Retail cost | $5,750 | $800 |