Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
60 Imaging
84 Features
74 Overall
80
83 Imaging
55 Features
33 Overall
46
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2019
- Superseded the Hasselblad X1D
- Replacement is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Revealed February 2012
- Superseded the Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Renewed by Sigma DP3 Merrill
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Following is a extended overview of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Sigma DP2 Merrill, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Hasselblad and Sigma. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and DP2 Merrill (15MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) posses totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe X1D II 50C was announced 7 years after the DP2 Merrill which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting right into a complete comparison, here is a short highlight of how the X1D II 50C grades vs the DP2 Merrill with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sigma DP2 Merrill. The whole galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
| X1D II 50C | DP2 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2019 | February 2012 | More modern by 90 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3.60" | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
| Display resolution | 2360k | 920k | Crisper display (+1440k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
| DP2 Merrill | X1D II 50C |
|---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sigma DP2 Merrill
| X1D II 50C | DP2 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera, you will have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has got physical measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Merrill has proportions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Compare the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Sigma DP2 Merrill in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the X1D II 50C and the DP2 Merrill.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and DP2 Merrill is 60 and 83 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes simply by looking at a spec sheet. The pic below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and DP2 Merrill.
As you can see, the two cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C using its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will give you more detail with its extra 36MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more modern X1D II 50C will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
| Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Hasselblad | Sigma |
| Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2019-06-19 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4704 x 3136 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 117 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 50mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Number of lenses | 13 | - |
| Crop factor | 0.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3.60 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.7 frames per second | 4.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 640x480 |
| Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lb) | 330 grams (0.73 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 102 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | - |
| Card slots | Dual | One |
| Retail pricing | $5,750 | $931 |