Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma fp
60 Imaging
84 Features
74 Overall
80
84 Imaging
74 Features
79 Overall
76
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma fp Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Announced June 2019
- Replaced the Hasselblad X1D
- Newer Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Released July 2019
- Successor is Sigma fp L
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma fp Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma fp, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Hasselblad and Sigma. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and fp (25MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and fp (Full frame) come with different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe X1D II 50C was released around the same time to the fp and they are both of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick view of how the X1D II 50C scores vs the fp in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma fp Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Sigma fp. The complete galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Sigma fp Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Sigma fp
| X1D II 50C | fp | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.60" |  | 3.2" | Bigger screen (+0.4") |
| Screen resolution | 2360k |  | 2100k | Crisper screen (+260k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
| fp | X1D II 50C |
|---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sigma fp
| X1D II 50C | fp | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2019 |  | July 2019 | Similar age |
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma fp Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has outer measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Sigma fp has proportions of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") with a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs).
Analyze the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma fp in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the X1D II 50C and the fp.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and fp is 60 and 84 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma fp Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing only by checking technical specs. The visual underneath will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and fp.
As you have seen, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The X1D II 50C due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will give you extra detail as a result of its extra 26 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma fp Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma fp Specifications
| Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sigma fp | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Sigma |
| Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sigma fp |
| Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2019-06-19 | 2019-07-11 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 35.9 x 23.9mm |
| Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 858.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 25 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Min boosted ISO | - | 6 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 117 | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Leica L |
| Number of lenses | 13 | 30 |
| Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3.60 inch | 3.2 inch |
| Resolution of display | 2,360k dots | 2,100k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.7 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | No |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 725 grams (1.60 pounds) | 422 grams (0.93 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 102 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 wec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
| Card slots | Two | 1 |
| Retail cost | $5,750 | $2,050 |