Clicky

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
60
Imaging
85
Features
74
Overall
80
Hasselblad X1D II 50C front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
68
Features
56
Overall
63

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
  • 51MP - Medium format Sensor
  • 3.60" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 2720 x 1530 video
  • Hasselblad X Mount
  • 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
  • Revealed June 2019
  • Superseded the Hasselblad X1D
  • Renewed by Hasselblad X2D
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Introduced February 2016
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma Quattro Overview

Following is a thorough review of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma Quattro, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Sigma. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and Quattro (APS-C) offer totally different sensor dimensions.

Photography Glossary

The X1D II 50C was launched 3 years after the Quattro which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).

Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the X1D II 50C scores versus the Quattro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Sigma Quattro

 X1D II 50C Quattro 
IntroducedJune 2019February 2016More modern by 41 months
Screen size3.60"3"Bigger screen (+0.6")
Screen resolution2360k1620kSharper screen (+740k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C

 Quattro X1D II 50C 

Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sigma Quattro

 X1D II 50C Quattro 
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C enjoys outside dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has specifications of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

Look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the X1D II 50C versus the Quattro.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and Quattro is 60 and 63 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

Often, it is tough to see the difference in sensor sizes simply by viewing a spec sheet. The pic below should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D II 50C and Quattro.

As you can see, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C because of its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 22 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern X1D II 50C is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Portrait photography advice
Sigma Quattro Portrait photography advice
91
you can focus manually
flash sync is higher than normal (1/2,000s)
resolution is excellent (51MP)
sensor size is big (Medium format)
exports RAW files
80
has manual focus
MP count high (29 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
features face detection focusing
saves RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Street photography with Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Street photography with Sigma Quattro
69
sensor size is big (Medium format)
exports RAW files
includes focus by touch
environment sealing
very good high ISO (25,600)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
59
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
weather proofing
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
heavier than others in class (625 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Sports photography with Sigma Quattro
73
quiet shooting (1/10,000s)
resolution is excellent (51 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Medium format)
has tracking focus
environment sealing
slow fps (2.7 fps)
no image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
69
MP count high (29 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
features tracking autofocus
weather proofing
sensor has phase detect AF
continuous shooting slow (3.8 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Travel photography info
Sigma Quattro Travel photography info
65
environment sealing
includes focus by touch
resolution is excellent (51 megapixels)
doesn't have Timelapse function
display isn't selfie friendly
54
weather proofing
MP count high (29MP)
does not have Time Lapse mode
heavier than others in class (625 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Landscape photography factors
Sigma Quattro Landscape photography factors
80
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Hasselblad X mount)
screen larger than average (3.60 inch)
resolution is excellent (51 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Medium format)
very good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
environment sealing
has double storage slots
no image stabilization
doesn't have Timelapse function
72
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
good sized screen (3 inches)
MP count high (29MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW files
weather proofing
lack of image stabilization
does not have Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C Vlogging factors
Sigma Quattro Vlogging factors
32
touch screen
high res video (2720 x 1530 pxls)
has microphone port
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
22
features face detection focusing
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution ( pxls)
does not have external mic support
heavier than others in class (625g)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sigma Quattro
 Hasselblad X1D II 50CSigma sd Quattro
General Information
Brand Hasselblad Sigma
Model Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sigma sd Quattro
Category Pro Mirrorless Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2019-06-19 2016-02-23
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size Medium format APS-C
Sensor dimensions 44 x 33mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 1,452.0mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 51 megapixel 29 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1 and 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 8272 x 6200 5424 x 3616
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Number of focus points 117 9
Lens
Lens mounting type Hasselblad X Sigma SA
Number of lenses 13 76
Crop factor 0.8 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3.60 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 2,360k dots 1,620k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 3,690k dots 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.87x 0.73x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/10000 seconds -
Continuous shooting rate 2.7 frames per sec 3.8 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash modes no built-in flash no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/2000 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 2720 x 1530 (30p) -
Highest video resolution 2720x1530 -
Video format H.264 -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS Built-in None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 725g (1.60 pounds) 625g (1.38 pounds)
Physical dimensions 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 102 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 26.2 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 14.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 4489 not tested
Other
Battery model - BP-61
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 2 Single
Cost at launch $5,750 $738