Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma Quattro
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


63 Imaging
68 Features
56 Overall
63
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Revealed June 2019
- Superseded the Hasselblad X1D
- Renewed by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 29MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma Quattro Overview
Following is a thorough review of the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma Quattro, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Sigma. There is a noticeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and Quattro (29MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and Quattro (APS-C) offer totally different sensor dimensions.

The X1D II 50C was launched 3 years after the Quattro which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the X1D II 50C scores versus the Quattro in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma Quattro Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Sigma sd Quattro. The complete galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Sigma Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Sigma Quattro
X1D II 50C | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2019 | ![]() | February 2016 | More modern by 41 months |
Screen size | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
Screen resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 1620k | Sharper screen (+740k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Quattro | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sigma Quattro
X1D II 50C | Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C enjoys outside dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro has specifications of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).
Look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the X1D II 50C versus the Quattro.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and Quattro is 60 and 63 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to see the difference in sensor sizes simply by viewing a spec sheet. The pic below should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the X1D II 50C and Quattro.
As you can see, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C because of its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 22 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern X1D II 50C is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sigma Quattro Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sigma sd Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Hasselblad | Sigma |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sigma sd Quattro |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2019-06-19 | 2016-02-23 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 29 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5424 x 3616 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Sigma SA |
Number of lenses | 13 | 76 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3.60 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 2,360k dots | 1,620k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/10000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.7 frames per sec | 3.8 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | - |
Highest video resolution | 2720x1530 | - |
Video format | H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 pounds) | 625g (1.38 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 2 | Single |
Cost at launch | $5,750 | $738 |