Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A7R V
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
60 Imaging
84 Features
96 Overall
88
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A7R V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2019
- Replaced the Hasselblad X1D
- Replacement is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 61MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.20" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Bump to 102800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 7680 x 4320 video
- Sony E Mount
- 723g - 131 x 97 x 82mm
- Launched October 2022
- Replaced the Sony A7R IV
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A7R V Overview
Lets look more closely at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Sony A7R V, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by manufacturers Hasselblad and Sony. The resolution of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and the A7R V (61MP) is fairly well matched but the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and A7R V (Full frame) possess different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe X1D II 50C was brought out 4 years prior to the A7R V which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A7R V being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the X1D II 50C scores versus the A7R V for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A7R V Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sony Alpha A7R V. The entire galleries are provided at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Sony A7R V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Sony A7R V
X1D II 50C | A7R V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.60" | 3.20" | Larger display (+0.4") |
Reasons to pick Sony A7R V over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
A7R V | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2022 | June 2019 | Newer by 40 months | |
Display type | Fully articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sony A7R V
X1D II 50C | A7R V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Display resolution | 2360k | 2360k | Identical display resolution | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A7R V Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C enjoys external measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Sony A7R V has dimensions of 131mm x 97mm x 82mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") along with a weight of 723 grams (1.59 lbs).
Examine the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Sony A7R V in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the X1D II 50C compared to the A7R V.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and A7R V is 60 and 60 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A7R V Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to picture the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reading through specifications. The picture below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and A7R V.
Plainly, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The X1D II 50C featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Sony A7R V will give greater detail having its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged X1D II 50C is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A7R V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A7R V Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sony Alpha A7R V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Sony |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sony Alpha A7R V |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2019-06-19 | 2022-10-26 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 61 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 9504 x 6336 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 32000 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 102800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 693 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | Sony E |
Amount of lenses | 13 | 187 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fully articulated |
Display size | 3.60" | 3.20" |
Display resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,360k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | 9,440k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.9x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/10000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.7 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync. |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/2000s | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 7680x4320 ( 25p, 23.98) |
Highest video resolution | 2720x1530 | 7680x4320 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, XAVC S, XAVC HS, XAVC S-I, H.264, H.265 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 pounds) | 723 gr (1.59 pounds) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 131 x 97 x 82mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 600 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Dual SD/CFexpress Type A slots |
Card slots | Two | Two |
Price at release | $5,750 | $3,900 |