Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A9
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


65 Imaging
73 Features
93 Overall
81
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2019
- Old Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Newer Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Raise to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 673g - 127 x 96 x 63mm
- Introduced April 2017
- Replacement is Sony A9 II

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A9 Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Sony A9, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by manufacturers Hasselblad and Sony. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and A9 (24MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and A9 (Full frame) feature totally different sensor size.

The X1D II 50C was launched 2 years after the A9 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A9 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the X1D II 50C matches up versus the A9 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A9 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sony Alpha A9. The complete galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Sony A9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Sony A9
X1D II 50C | A9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2019 | ![]() | April 2017 | Newer by 27 months |
Display sizing | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 1440k | Sharper display (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A9 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
A9 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sony A9
X1D II 50C | A9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A9 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C enjoys outer measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Sony A9 has dimensions of 127mm x 96mm x 63mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.5") and a weight of 673 grams (1.48 lbs).
Contrast the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Sony A9 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the X1D II 50C versus the A9.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and A9 is 60 and 65 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A9 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions just by checking out a spec sheet. The image below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and A9.
Clearly, each of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The X1D II 50C due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will produce greater detail utilizing its extra 27 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger X1D II 50C will have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A9 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A9 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sony Alpha A9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Sony |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sony Alpha A9 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2019-06-19 | 2017-04-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 35.6 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 847.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 204800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | 693 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Sony E |
Amount of lenses | 13 | 121 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3.60 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 2,360 thousand dot | 1,440 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dot | 3,686 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.78x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/10000s | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.7fps | 20.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync., Red-eye reduction, Wireless, Hi-speed sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | - |
Max video resolution | 2720x1530 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lbs) | 673 grams (1.48 lbs) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 127 x 96 x 63mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 102 | 92 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 24.9 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 13.3 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 3517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 650 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 5, 10 secs + continuous) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II compatible) |
Storage slots | Dual | Dual |
Price at release | $5,750 | $4,498 |