Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony NEX-C3
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


91 Imaging
56 Features
57 Overall
56
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony NEX-C3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Announced June 2019
- Older Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Updated by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1280 x 720 video
- Sony E Mount
- 225g - 110 x 60 x 33mm
- Launched August 2011
- Previous Model is Sony NEX-3
- Replacement is Sony NEX-F3

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony NEX-C3 Overview
In this write-up, we are evaluating the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Sony NEX-C3, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Hasselblad and Sony. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and NEX-C3 (16MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and NEX-C3 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizes.

The X1D II 50C was manufactured 7 years after the NEX-C3 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a brief summary of how the X1D II 50C grades vs the NEX-C3 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony NEX-C3 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sony Alpha NEX-C3. The entire galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Sony NEX-C3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Sony NEX-C3
X1D II 50C | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | June 2019 | ![]() | August 2011 | Newer by 96 months |
Display sizing | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper display (+1440k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-C3 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
NEX-C3 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sony NEX-C3
X1D II 50C | NEX-C3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony NEX-C3 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C provides exterior measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Sony NEX-C3 has specifications of 110mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Compare the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Sony NEX-C3 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the X1D II 50C versus the NEX-C3.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and NEX-C3 is 60 and 91 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony NEX-C3 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading through technical specs. The pic underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the X1D II 50C and NEX-C3.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The X1D II 50C featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will resolve greater detail due to its extra 35MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The more recent X1D II 50C is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony NEX-C3 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony NEX-C3 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Hasselblad | Sony |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sony Alpha NEX-C3 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2019-06-19 | 2011-08-22 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4912 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Hasselblad X | Sony E |
Number of lenses | 13 | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3.60 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 2,360k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/10000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.7 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/2000s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725g (1.60 pounds) | 225g (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 110 x 60 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 102 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 1083 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 pictures |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Launch price | $5,750 | $343 |