Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony NEX-F3
60 Imaging
86 Features
74 Overall
81
86 Imaging
57 Features
60 Overall
58
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony NEX-F3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2019
- Old Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Later Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 314g - 117 x 67 x 42mm
- Revealed August 2012
- Superseded the Sony NEX-C3
- Refreshed by Sony NEX-3N
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony NEX-F3 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sony NEX-F3, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Hasselblad and Sony. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and NEX-F3 (16MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and NEX-F3 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe X1D II 50C was manufactured 6 years later than the NEX-F3 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple summation of how the X1D II 50C grades vs the NEX-F3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony NEX-F3 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sony Alpha NEX-F3. The entire galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and Sony NEX-F3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Sony NEX-F3
X1D II 50C | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2019 | August 2012 | More recent by 84 months | |
Display size | 3.60" | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
Display resolution | 2360k | 920k | Sharper display (+1440k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-F3 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
NEX-F3 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sony NEX-F3
X1D II 50C | NEX-F3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony NEX-F3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C provides outer measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the Sony NEX-F3 has specifications of 117mm x 67mm x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 314 grams (0.69 lbs).
Compare the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sony NEX-F3 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the X1D II 50C compared to the NEX-F3.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the X1D II 50C and NEX-F3 is 60 and 86 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony NEX-F3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to imagine the gap in sensor measurements just by researching a spec sheet. The visual below will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and NEX-F3.
Clearly, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will result in extra detail due to its extra 35 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The newer X1D II 50C should have an edge in sensor tech.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony NEX-F3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony NEX-F3 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Sony |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sony Alpha NEX-F3 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2019-06-19 | 2012-08-16 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 16000 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Sony E |
Available lenses | 13 | 121 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3.60 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 2,360k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Xtra Fine LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/10000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.7fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lbs) | 314 gr (0.69 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 117 x 67 x 42mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | 12.3 |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | 1114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 470 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Two | One |
Price at launch | $5,750 | $470 |