Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6500
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


81 Imaging
67 Features
85 Overall
74
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2019
- Older Model is Hasselblad X1D
- New Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Push to 51200)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 453g - 120 x 67 x 53mm
- Introduced October 2016
- Old Model is Sony A6300

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6500 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sony A6500, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Hasselblad and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and A6500 (24MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and A6500 (APS-C) provide different sensor sizes.

The X1D II 50C was released 2 years after the A6500 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summary of how the X1D II 50C matches up versus the A6500 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6500 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Sony Alpha a6500. The complete galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Sony A6500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Sony A6500
X1D II 50C | A6500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2019 | ![]() | October 2016 | More modern by 33 months |
Screen size | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.6") |
Screen resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 922k | Clearer screen (+1438k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A6500 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
A6500 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sony A6500
X1D II 50C | A6500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6500 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C features physical measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Sony A6500 has dimensions of 120mm x 67mm x 53mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.1") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sony A6500 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the X1D II 50C and the A6500.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and A6500 is 60 and 81 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to picture the difference between sensor sizes just by reading specifications. The picture underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and A6500.
Plainly, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 27MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The fresher X1D II 50C provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6500 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6500 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sony Alpha a6500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Sony |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sony Alpha a6500 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2019-06-19 | 2016-10-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Hasselblad X | Sony E |
Amount of lenses | 13 | 121 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3.60 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/10000s | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.7fps | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction (On/Off selectable), Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/2000s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 2720x1530 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lb) | 453 gr (1.00 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 120 x 67 x 53mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | 85 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 24.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 13.7 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 1405 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | With downloadable app | |
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | Two | 1 |
Price at release | $5,750 | $1,298 |