Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6700
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
75 Imaging
74 Features
96 Overall
82
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Revealed June 2019
- Old Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Newer Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Bump to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 493g - 122 x 69 x 75mm
- Launched July 2023
- Old Model is Sony A6600
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6700 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6700, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Hasselblad and Sony. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and A6700 (26MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and A6700 (APS-C) boast different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe X1D II 50C was brought out 5 years earlier than the A6700 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the X1D II 50C scores versus the A6700 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6700 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Sony Alpha a6700. The entire galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Sony A6700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Sony A6700
X1D II 50C | A6700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3.60" | 3.00" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 2360k | 1040k | Crisper screen (+1320k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A6700 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
A6700 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2023 | June 2019 | More modern by 49 months | |
Screen type | Fully articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sony A6700
X1D II 50C | A6700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6700 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry around your camera, you need to factor its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has got exterior dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Sony A6700 has specifications of 122mm x 69mm x 75mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 3.0") along with a weight of 493 grams (1.09 lbs).
Analyze the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6700 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the X1D II 50C versus the A6700.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the X1D II 50C and A6700 is 60 and 75 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6700 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes just by going through technical specs. The picture here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D II 50C and A6700.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The X1D II 50C due to its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will produce more detail having its extra 25MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged X1D II 50C will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6700 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony A6700 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sony Alpha a6700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Sony |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sony Alpha a6700 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2019-06-19 | 2023-07-12 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 26MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 6192 x 4128 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 32000 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | 759 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Hasselblad X | Sony E |
Available lenses | 13 | 199 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully articulated |
Display diagonal | 3.60 inch | 3.00 inch |
Resolution of display | 2,360k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dot | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.71x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/10000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.7fps | 11.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Flash off, Autoflash, Fill-flash, Rear Sync., Slow Sync., Red-eye reduction (On/Off selectable), Hi-speed sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 3840 x 2160 @ 120p / 280 Mbps, XAVC HS, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 2720x1530 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 pounds) | 493 gr (1.09 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 122 x 69 x 75mm (4.8" x 2.7" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 570 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FZ1000 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | Dual | One |
Retail pricing | $5,750 | $1,399 |