Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony RX1R II
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80


78 Imaging
75 Features
65 Overall
71
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Announced June 2019
- Superseded the Hasselblad X1D
- Renewed by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 50 - 25600 (Expand to 102400)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
- Introduced October 2015
- Succeeded the Sony RX1R

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony RX1R II Overview
In this write-up, we are matching up the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Sony RX1R II, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Hasselblad and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and RX1R II (Full frame) enjoy different sensor sizing.

The X1D II 50C was released 3 years later than the RX1R II and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX1R II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the X1D II 50C scores against the RX1R II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony RX1R II Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II. The complete galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Sony RX1R II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Sony RX1R II
X1D II 50C | RX1R II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2019 | ![]() | October 2015 | More recent by 45 months |
Display sizing | 3.60" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 1229k | Crisper display (+1131k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
RX1R II | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sony RX1R II
X1D II 50C | RX1R II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has got exterior dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") along with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) while the Sony RX1R II has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") having a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).
Examine the Hasselblad X1D II 50C versus Sony RX1R II in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising during that time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the X1D II 50C against the RX1R II.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and RX1R II is 60 and 78 respectively.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at specs. The visual underneath will help give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D II 50C and RX1R II.
All in all, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The X1D II 50C featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will give you more detail as a result of its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics far more aggressively. The newer X1D II 50C should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony RX1R II Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Hasselblad | Sony |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2019-06-19 | 2015-10-13 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 42MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 7952 x 5304 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Hasselblad X | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.0 |
Macro focusing range | - | 14cm |
Amount of lenses | 13 | - |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3.60" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 2,360 thousand dots | 1,229 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/10000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.7 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p) |
Highest video resolution | 2720x1530 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 pounds) | 507 gr (1.12 pounds) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | 97 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | 25.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | 13.9 |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | 3204 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2,5, 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | Two | 1 |
Pricing at release | $5,750 | $3,300 |