Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony ZV-E10
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
86 Imaging
71 Features
92 Overall
79
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony ZV-E10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Released June 2019
- Replaced the Hasselblad X1D
- Later Model is Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Increase to 51200)
- 3840 x 1920 video
- Sony E Mount
- 343g - 115 x 64 x 45mm
- Released July 2021
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony ZV-E10 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony ZV-E10, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Hasselblad and Sony. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and ZV-E10 (24MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and ZV-E10 (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe X1D II 50C was introduced 3 years prior to the ZV-E10 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summary of how the X1D II 50C grades against the ZV-E10 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony ZV-E10 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Hasselblad X1D II 50C & Sony ZV-E10. The whole galleries are available at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery & Sony ZV-E10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Sony ZV-E10
X1D II 50C | ZV-E10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3.60" | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
Display resolution | 2360k | 920k | Clearer display (+1440k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony ZV-E10 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
ZV-E10 | X1D II 50C | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2021 | June 2019 | Fresher by 25 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and Sony ZV-E10
X1D II 50C | ZV-E10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony ZV-E10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C has exterior dimensions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) whilst the Sony ZV-E10 has sizing of 115mm x 64mm x 45mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.8") accompanied by a weight of 343 grams (0.76 lbs).
Look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony ZV-E10 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the X1D II 50C compared to the ZV-E10.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and ZV-E10 is 60 and 86 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony ZV-E10 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing merely by reviewing technical specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the X1D II 50C and ZV-E10.
As you can tell, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The X1D II 50C with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will offer extra detail using its extra 27 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The older X1D II 50C is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony ZV-E10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs Sony ZV-E10 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sony ZV-E10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Hasselblad | Sony |
Model type | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | Sony ZV-E10 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2019-06-19 | 2021-07-30 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 44 x 33mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 1,452.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 32000 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 117 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Hasselblad X | Sony E |
Available lenses | 13 | 150 |
Focal length multiplier | 0.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3.60" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 2,360 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/10000s | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.7 frames/s | 11.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 3840 x 1920 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 1920 @ 25p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 100p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 50 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 2720x1530 | 3840x1920 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 725 grams (1.60 lbs) | 343 grams (0.76 lbs) |
Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 115 x 64 x 45mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 440 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Launch cost | $5,750 | $699 |