Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs YI M1
60 Imaging
85 Features
74 Overall
80
87 Imaging
59 Features
66 Overall
61
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs YI M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Launched June 2019
- Previous Model is Hasselblad X1D
- Updated by Hasselblad X2D
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 350g - 114 x 64 x 34mm
- Announced September 2016
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs YI M1 Overview
Here, we are analyzing the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and YI M1, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Hasselblad and YI. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the X1D II 50C (51MP) and M1 (20MP) and the X1D II 50C (Medium format) and M1 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe X1D II 50C was introduced 2 years after the M1 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summation of how the X1D II 50C scores versus the M1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs YI M1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Hasselblad X1D II 50C and YI M1. The whole galleries are viewable at Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery and YI M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the YI M1
X1D II 50C | M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2019 | September 2016 | Newer by 34 months | |
Display size | 3.60" | 3" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
Display resolution | 2360k | 1040k | Sharper display (+1320k dot) |
Reasons to pick YI M1 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
M1 | X1D II 50C |
---|
Common features in the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and YI M1
X1D II 50C | M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs YI M1 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Hasselblad X1D II 50C features physical measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs) and the YI M1 has specifications of 114mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 350 grams (0.77 lbs).
Look at the Hasselblad X1D II 50C and YI M1 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view measurements comparison of the X1D II 50C against the M1.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the X1D II 50C and M1 is 60 and 87 respectively.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs YI M1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to envision the gap in sensor dimensions purely by researching technical specs. The pic underneath may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the X1D II 50C and M1.
As you can tell, both of those cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The X1D II 50C with its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will result in greater detail using its extra 31 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The fresher X1D II 50C will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs YI M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Hasselblad X1D II 50C vs YI M1 Specifications
Hasselblad X1D II 50C | YI M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Hasselblad | YI |
Model | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | YI M1 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2019-06-19 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Medium format | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 44 x 33mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 1,452.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 51 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1 and 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 8272 x 6200 | 5184 x 3888 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 117 | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Hasselblad X | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 13 | 107 |
Crop factor | 0.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3.60 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 2,360k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.87x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/10000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.7 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Red-Eye Slow |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/2000s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 2720 x 1530 (30p) | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 75 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC |
Highest video resolution | 2720x1530 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Built-in | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 725 gr (1.60 lbs) | 350 gr (0.77 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") | 114 x 64 x 34mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 102 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 26.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 4489 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 450 photographs |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | Two | One |
Price at release | $5,750 | $320 |