Clicky

Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-1

Portability
80
Imaging
62
Features
88
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front
 
Olympus XZ-1 front
Portability
88
Imaging
35
Features
51
Overall
41

Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs

Olympus E-M5 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
  • Introduced October 2019
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M5 II
  • Replacement is OM System OM-5
Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
  • Launched January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-1, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are created by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and XZ-1 (1/1.63") offer totally different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M5 III was announced 8 years after the XZ-1 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera.

Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-M5 III matches up against the XZ-1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Olympus XZ-1

 E-M5 III XZ-1 
LaunchedOctober 2019January 2011More modern by 107 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1040k614kClearer display (+426k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus E-M5 III

 XZ-1 E-M5 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus XZ-1

 E-M5 III XZ-1 
Focus manually Very precise focus
Display size3"3"Same display measurement

Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry around your camera, you need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 III provides external dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-1 has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M5 III and the XZ-1.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and XZ-1 is 80 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor sizes purely by checking specifications. The picture here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 III and XZ-1.

Plainly, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 III having a larger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 III will give greater detail with its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-M5 III is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Portrait photography info
Olympus XZ-1 Portrait photography info
77
you can focus manually
decent MP (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focus
delivers RAW files
45
focusing manually
offers face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.63")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Street photography advice
Olympus XZ-1 Street photography advice
83
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
boasts touch to focus
weather proofing
good ISO range (25,600)
59
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
screen is fixed
small sensor size (1/1.63")
more heavy than others (275g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III as a Sports photography camera
Olympus XZ-1 as a Sports photography camera
76
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
high frames per second (30.0 frames/s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
weather proofing
sensor has phase detect auto focus
bad battery life (310 per charge)
38
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking autofocus
great battery power (320 per charge)
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
megapixel count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.63")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III as a Travel photography camera
Olympus XZ-1 as a Travel photography camera
77
weather proofing
has bluetooth
boasts touch to focus
decent MP (20MP)
selfie friendly screen
bad battery life (310 per charge)
62
great battery power (320 CIPA)
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than others (275g)
megapixel count low (10MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M5 III
Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-1
77
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
weather proofing
bad battery life (310 per charge)
54
focusing manually
quite wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW files
great battery power (320 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.63")
lack of Timelapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M5 III Vlogging features
Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging features
84
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection focus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
includes external microphone jack
31
quite wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f1.8)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection autofocus
doesn't have selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone port
more heavy than others (275g)
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus XZ-1
 Olympus OM-D E-M5 IIIOlympus XZ-1
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M5 III Olympus XZ-1
Type Advanced Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2019-10-17 2011-01-26
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII TruePic V
Sensor type MOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.63"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 8.07 x 5.56mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 44.9mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 5184 x 3888 3664 x 2752
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Minimum boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 121 11
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-112mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/1.8-2.5
Macro focus range - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 4.5
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,040 thousand dot 614 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech - OLED
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting speed 30.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash settings Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 4096x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 414 grams (0.91 pounds) 275 grams (0.61 pounds)
Physical dimensions 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 34
DXO Color Depth score not tested 18.8
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.4
DXO Low light score not tested 117
Other
Battery life 310 pictures 320 pictures
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLN-1 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $1,199 $567