Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-1
80 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Introduced October 2019
- Replaced the Olympus E-M5 II
- Replacement is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-1, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are created by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and XZ-1 (1/1.63") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M5 III was announced 8 years after the XZ-1 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-M5 III matches up against the XZ-1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III and Olympus XZ-1. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery and Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Olympus XZ-1
E-M5 III | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | October 2019 | January 2011 | More modern by 107 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 614k | Clearer display (+426k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus E-M5 III
XZ-1 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Olympus XZ-1
E-M5 III | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement |
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera, you need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 III provides external dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Olympus XZ-1 has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M5 III and the XZ-1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and XZ-1 is 80 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to see the gap between sensor sizes purely by checking specifications. The picture here will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M5 III and XZ-1.
Plainly, both of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M5 III having a larger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 III will give greater detail with its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-M5 III is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M5 III vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Olympus XZ-1 |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2019-10-17 | 2011-01-26 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | TruePic V |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.63" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3664 x 2752 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 30.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414 grams (0.91 pounds) | 275 grams (0.61 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 34 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 pictures | 320 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $1,199 | $567 |